Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials

Abstract There is considerable debate about whether the partition volumes of the mammalian brain (e.g. cerebrum, cerebellum) evolve according to functional selection, or whether developmental constraints of conserved neurogenetic scheduling cause predictable partition scaling with brain size. Here w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alison Carlisle, Lynne Selwood, Lyn A. Hinds, Norman Saunders, Mark Habgood, Karine Mardon, Vera Weisbecker
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c1c2afdf1e34f749d418eaf38c99573
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c1c2afdf1e34f749d418eaf38c99573
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c1c2afdf1e34f749d418eaf38c995732021-12-02T16:06:42ZTesting hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials10.1038/s41598-017-02726-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1c1c2afdf1e34f749d418eaf38c995732017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02726-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract There is considerable debate about whether the partition volumes of the mammalian brain (e.g. cerebrum, cerebellum) evolve according to functional selection, or whether developmental constraints of conserved neurogenetic scheduling cause predictable partition scaling with brain size. Here we provide the first investigation of developmental constraints on partition volume growth, derived from contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography of hydrogel-stabilized brains from three marsupial species. ANCOVAs of partition vs. brain volume scaling, as well as growth curve comparisons, do not support several hypotheses consistent with developmental constraints: brain partition growth significantly differs between species, or between developing vs. adult marsupials. Partition growth appears independent of adult brain volume, with no discernable growth spurts/lags relatable to internal structural change. Rather, adult proportion differences appear to arise through growth rate/duration heterochrony. Substantial phylogenetic signal in adult brain partitions scaling with brain volume also counters expectations of development-mediated partition scaling conservatism. However, the scaling of olfactory bulb growth is markedly irregular, consistent with suggestions that it is less constrained. The very regular partition growth curves suggest intraspecific developmental rigidity. We speculate that a rigid, possibly neuromer-model-like early molecular program might be responsible both for regular growth curves within species and impressions of a link between neurogenesis and partition evolution.Alison CarlisleLynne SelwoodLyn A. HindsNorman SaundersMark HabgoodKarine MardonVera WeisbeckerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Alison Carlisle
Lynne Selwood
Lyn A. Hinds
Norman Saunders
Mark Habgood
Karine Mardon
Vera Weisbecker
Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
description Abstract There is considerable debate about whether the partition volumes of the mammalian brain (e.g. cerebrum, cerebellum) evolve according to functional selection, or whether developmental constraints of conserved neurogenetic scheduling cause predictable partition scaling with brain size. Here we provide the first investigation of developmental constraints on partition volume growth, derived from contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography of hydrogel-stabilized brains from three marsupial species. ANCOVAs of partition vs. brain volume scaling, as well as growth curve comparisons, do not support several hypotheses consistent with developmental constraints: brain partition growth significantly differs between species, or between developing vs. adult marsupials. Partition growth appears independent of adult brain volume, with no discernable growth spurts/lags relatable to internal structural change. Rather, adult proportion differences appear to arise through growth rate/duration heterochrony. Substantial phylogenetic signal in adult brain partitions scaling with brain volume also counters expectations of development-mediated partition scaling conservatism. However, the scaling of olfactory bulb growth is markedly irregular, consistent with suggestions that it is less constrained. The very regular partition growth curves suggest intraspecific developmental rigidity. We speculate that a rigid, possibly neuromer-model-like early molecular program might be responsible both for regular growth curves within species and impressions of a link between neurogenesis and partition evolution.
format article
author Alison Carlisle
Lynne Selwood
Lyn A. Hinds
Norman Saunders
Mark Habgood
Karine Mardon
Vera Weisbecker
author_facet Alison Carlisle
Lynne Selwood
Lyn A. Hinds
Norman Saunders
Mark Habgood
Karine Mardon
Vera Weisbecker
author_sort Alison Carlisle
title Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
title_short Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
title_full Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
title_fullStr Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
title_full_unstemmed Testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
title_sort testing hypotheses of developmental constraints on mammalian brain partition evolution, using marsupials
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/1c1c2afdf1e34f749d418eaf38c99573
work_keys_str_mv AT alisoncarlisle testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT lynneselwood testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT lynahinds testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT normansaunders testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT markhabgood testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT karinemardon testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
AT veraweisbecker testinghypothesesofdevelopmentalconstraintsonmammalianbrainpartitionevolutionusingmarsupials
_version_ 1718384888314331136