Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature

Sangeeta Abrol,1 Sukriti Gupta,1 Mayuresh Naik,2 Siddharth Agarwal3 1Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi 110029, India; 2Department of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H. Centenary Hospital, New Delhi 110062, India; 3Department of Research, Mayo Clinic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrol S, Gupta S, Naik M, Agarwal S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c25f9fb38ed48e199e4935b531a6746
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c25f9fb38ed48e199e4935b531a6746
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c25f9fb38ed48e199e4935b531a67462021-12-02T10:45:08ZCan We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/1c25f9fb38ed48e199e4935b531a67462020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/can-we-corroborate-peripapillary-rnfl-analysis-with-macular-gcipl-anal-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Sangeeta Abrol,1 Sukriti Gupta,1 Mayuresh Naik,2 Siddharth Agarwal3 1Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi 110029, India; 2Department of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H. Centenary Hospital, New Delhi 110062, India; 3Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence: Mayuresh NaikDepartment of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H. Centenary Hospital, Room No. 3 of Eye OPD, 1st Floor of OPD Building, Near GK-2, Alaknanda, New Delhi 110062, IndiaTel +91-8287344576Email mayureshpnaik@gmail.comPurpose: To determine whether macular volume and macular GCA measurements in patients are comparable to their RNFL thickness parameters.Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 1380 eyes with 460 each, into three groups. Group I: patients with healthy eyes. Group II: patients diagnosed as pre-perimetric glaucoma. Group III: patients with diagnosed perimetric glaucoma. After patients were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline standard ophthalmic examination was done by the same operator under the same settings, including SD-OCT using both the Spectralis SD-OCT and the Cirrus SD-OCT as elaborated below.Statistical Analysis: Data were checked for normality before statistical analysis using Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using ANOVA. For all statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define the ability RNFL and GCC parameters to distinguish perimetric and preperimetric glaucomatous eyes from control eyes.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the average, superior, inferior RNFL thickness and average, superior, inferior GCIPL thickness between Group I and Group II (p< 0.001), between Group I and Group III (p< 0.001) and also between Group II and Group III (p< 0.001). The statistical significance was also reflected in their AUROCs.Conclusion: Mean, superior, inferior GCIPL thickness along with macular volume analysis can substantiate RNFL analysis for diagnosis, serial monitoring and follow-up of glaucoma patients and suspects.Keywords: RNFL, GCC, perimetric glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucomaAbrol SGupta SNaik MAgarwal SDove Medical Pressarticlernfl ; gcc ; perimetric glaucoma ; pre-perimetric glaucoma .OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 3763-3774 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic rnfl ; gcc ; perimetric glaucoma ; pre-perimetric glaucoma .
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle rnfl ; gcc ; perimetric glaucoma ; pre-perimetric glaucoma .
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Abrol S
Gupta S
Naik M
Agarwal S
Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
description Sangeeta Abrol,1 Sukriti Gupta,1 Mayuresh Naik,2 Siddharth Agarwal3 1Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi 110029, India; 2Department of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H. Centenary Hospital, New Delhi 110062, India; 3Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence: Mayuresh NaikDepartment of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H. Centenary Hospital, Room No. 3 of Eye OPD, 1st Floor of OPD Building, Near GK-2, Alaknanda, New Delhi 110062, IndiaTel +91-8287344576Email mayureshpnaik@gmail.comPurpose: To determine whether macular volume and macular GCA measurements in patients are comparable to their RNFL thickness parameters.Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 1380 eyes with 460 each, into three groups. Group I: patients with healthy eyes. Group II: patients diagnosed as pre-perimetric glaucoma. Group III: patients with diagnosed perimetric glaucoma. After patients were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline standard ophthalmic examination was done by the same operator under the same settings, including SD-OCT using both the Spectralis SD-OCT and the Cirrus SD-OCT as elaborated below.Statistical Analysis: Data were checked for normality before statistical analysis using Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using ANOVA. For all statistical tests, a p < 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define the ability RNFL and GCC parameters to distinguish perimetric and preperimetric glaucomatous eyes from control eyes.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the average, superior, inferior RNFL thickness and average, superior, inferior GCIPL thickness between Group I and Group II (p< 0.001), between Group I and Group III (p< 0.001) and also between Group II and Group III (p< 0.001). The statistical significance was also reflected in their AUROCs.Conclusion: Mean, superior, inferior GCIPL thickness along with macular volume analysis can substantiate RNFL analysis for diagnosis, serial monitoring and follow-up of glaucoma patients and suspects.Keywords: RNFL, GCC, perimetric glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma
format article
author Abrol S
Gupta S
Naik M
Agarwal S
author_facet Abrol S
Gupta S
Naik M
Agarwal S
author_sort Abrol S
title Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
title_short Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
title_full Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
title_fullStr Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
title_sort can we corroborate peripapillary rnfl analysis with macular gcipl analysis? our 2-year experience at a single-centre tertiary healthcare hospital using two oct machines and a review of literature
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/1c25f9fb38ed48e199e4935b531a6746
work_keys_str_mv AT abrols canwecorroborateperipapillaryrnflanalysiswithmaculargciplanalysisour2yearexperienceatasinglecentretertiaryhealthcarehospitalusingtwooctmachinesandareviewofliterature
AT guptas canwecorroborateperipapillaryrnflanalysiswithmaculargciplanalysisour2yearexperienceatasinglecentretertiaryhealthcarehospitalusingtwooctmachinesandareviewofliterature
AT naikm canwecorroborateperipapillaryrnflanalysiswithmaculargciplanalysisour2yearexperienceatasinglecentretertiaryhealthcarehospitalusingtwooctmachinesandareviewofliterature
AT agarwals canwecorroborateperipapillaryrnflanalysiswithmaculargciplanalysisour2yearexperienceatasinglecentretertiaryhealthcarehospitalusingtwooctmachinesandareviewofliterature
_version_ 1718396751094743040