Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface

Geogrid-reinforced structures are extensively adopted in various engineering fields. At present, the influence of boundary conditions was not considered in design methods, bringing hidden dangers to the safety of the structure. In the current study, a series of pullout tests were carried out on high...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng Zuo, Guangqing Yang, Zhijie Wang, He Wang, Jing Jin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c50234de68d47beb5753892cdb7aa97
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c50234de68d47beb5753892cdb7aa97
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c50234de68d47beb5753892cdb7aa972021-11-11T15:02:13ZEffect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface10.3390/app112199422076-3417https://doaj.org/article/1c50234de68d47beb5753892cdb7aa972021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9942https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417Geogrid-reinforced structures are extensively adopted in various engineering fields. At present, the influence of boundary conditions was not considered in design methods, bringing hidden dangers to the safety of the structure. In the current study, a series of pullout tests were carried out on high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geogrid-reinforced coarse sand. The magnitude and growth pattern of pullout resistance and the variation laws of interfacial shear strength indexes under four types of boundary conditions were analyzed. Additionally, the boundary reduction coefficient (<i>BRC</i>) was introduced to establish the relationship between rigid and flexible boundary for the design of the structure. The tests results showed that the boundary conditions cannot be ignored in the design of structures, especially in the front. When the normal loading was up to 120 kPa, the <i>BRC</i>-top and <i>BRC</i>-positive could be taken as 0.9 and 0.5, respectively, and verified by fitting results. The boundary conditions affected the pullout resistance, while the vertical loading corresponding to the maximum pullout resistance was not related to boundary conditions. Investigating the interaction of the geogrid–soil under different boundary conditions can help to improve the understanding of the behavior of reinforced soil structure, and to achieve a more efficient and economical design.Zheng ZuoGuangqing YangZhijie WangHe WangJing JinMDPI AGarticlegeogridpullout testboundary conditionsTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 9942, p 9942 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic geogrid
pullout test
boundary conditions
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle geogrid
pullout test
boundary conditions
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Zheng Zuo
Guangqing Yang
Zhijie Wang
He Wang
Jing Jin
Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
description Geogrid-reinforced structures are extensively adopted in various engineering fields. At present, the influence of boundary conditions was not considered in design methods, bringing hidden dangers to the safety of the structure. In the current study, a series of pullout tests were carried out on high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geogrid-reinforced coarse sand. The magnitude and growth pattern of pullout resistance and the variation laws of interfacial shear strength indexes under four types of boundary conditions were analyzed. Additionally, the boundary reduction coefficient (<i>BRC</i>) was introduced to establish the relationship between rigid and flexible boundary for the design of the structure. The tests results showed that the boundary conditions cannot be ignored in the design of structures, especially in the front. When the normal loading was up to 120 kPa, the <i>BRC</i>-top and <i>BRC</i>-positive could be taken as 0.9 and 0.5, respectively, and verified by fitting results. The boundary conditions affected the pullout resistance, while the vertical loading corresponding to the maximum pullout resistance was not related to boundary conditions. Investigating the interaction of the geogrid–soil under different boundary conditions can help to improve the understanding of the behavior of reinforced soil structure, and to achieve a more efficient and economical design.
format article
author Zheng Zuo
Guangqing Yang
Zhijie Wang
He Wang
Jing Jin
author_facet Zheng Zuo
Guangqing Yang
Zhijie Wang
He Wang
Jing Jin
author_sort Zheng Zuo
title Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
title_short Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
title_full Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
title_fullStr Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Mechanical Behavior of the Geogrid–Soil Interface
title_sort effect of boundary conditions on the mechanical behavior of the geogrid–soil interface
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1c50234de68d47beb5753892cdb7aa97
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzuo effectofboundaryconditionsonthemechanicalbehaviorofthegeogridsoilinterface
AT guangqingyang effectofboundaryconditionsonthemechanicalbehaviorofthegeogridsoilinterface
AT zhijiewang effectofboundaryconditionsonthemechanicalbehaviorofthegeogridsoilinterface
AT hewang effectofboundaryconditionsonthemechanicalbehaviorofthegeogridsoilinterface
AT jingjin effectofboundaryconditionsonthemechanicalbehaviorofthegeogridsoilinterface
_version_ 1718437578596679680