Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54%...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin Löwer, Bernhard Y Renard, Jos de Graaf, Meike Wagner, Claudia Paret, Christoph Kneip, Ozlem Türeci, Mustafa Diken, Cedrik Britten, Sebastian Kreiter, Michael Koslowski, John C Castle, Ugur Sahin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c52d2b15f6f4004b65dab08bbc818ce
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c52d2b15f6f4004b65dab08bbc818ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c52d2b15f6f4004b65dab08bbc818ce2021-11-18T05:50:57ZConfidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714https://doaj.org/article/1c52d2b15f6f4004b65dab08bbc818ce2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23028300/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set.Martin LöwerBernhard Y RenardJos de GraafMeike WagnerClaudia ParetChristoph KneipOzlem TüreciMustafa DikenCedrik BrittenSebastian KreiterMichael KoslowskiJohn C CastleUgur SahinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e1002714 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Martin Löwer
Bernhard Y Renard
Jos de Graaf
Meike Wagner
Claudia Paret
Christoph Kneip
Ozlem Türeci
Mustafa Diken
Cedrik Britten
Sebastian Kreiter
Michael Koslowski
John C Castle
Ugur Sahin
Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
description Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set.
format article
author Martin Löwer
Bernhard Y Renard
Jos de Graaf
Meike Wagner
Claudia Paret
Christoph Kneip
Ozlem Türeci
Mustafa Diken
Cedrik Britten
Sebastian Kreiter
Michael Koslowski
John C Castle
Ugur Sahin
author_facet Martin Löwer
Bernhard Y Renard
Jos de Graaf
Meike Wagner
Claudia Paret
Christoph Kneip
Ozlem Türeci
Mustafa Diken
Cedrik Britten
Sebastian Kreiter
Michael Koslowski
John C Castle
Ugur Sahin
author_sort Martin Löwer
title Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
title_short Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
title_full Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
title_fullStr Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
title_full_unstemmed Confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
title_sort confidence-based somatic mutation evaluation and prioritization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/1c52d2b15f6f4004b65dab08bbc818ce
work_keys_str_mv AT martinlower confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT bernhardyrenard confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT josdegraaf confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT meikewagner confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT claudiaparet confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT christophkneip confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT ozlemtureci confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT mustafadiken confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT cedrikbritten confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT sebastiankreiter confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT michaelkoslowski confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT johnccastle confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
AT ugursahin confidencebasedsomaticmutationevaluationandprioritization
_version_ 1718424772593844224