Embodied practices of prosthesis

While the prosthesis is often thought of as a technology or an artefact used to ‘fix’ or make ‘whole’ a disabled body, it has also become an important figuration and metaphor for thinking about disabled embodiment as an emblematic manifestation of bodily difference and mobility. Furthermore, the am...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø, Camilla Bruun Eriksen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DA
EN
NB
SV
Publicado: The Royal Danish Library 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c674ff1c4954f798d561e8a5ca0fd79
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c674ff1c4954f798d561e8a5ca0fd79
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c674ff1c4954f798d561e8a5ca0fd792021-11-29T16:52:56ZEmbodied practices of prosthesis10.7146/kkf.v31i2.1278742245-6937https://doaj.org/article/1c674ff1c4954f798d561e8a5ca0fd792021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/127874https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937 While the prosthesis is often thought of as a technology or an artefact used to ‘fix’ or make ‘whole’ a disabled body, it has also become an important figuration and metaphor for thinking about disabled embodiment as an emblematic manifestation of bodily difference and mobility. Furthermore, the ambiguity and broadness of prosthesis as an object and a concept, as well as its potential as a theoretical and analytical thinking tool, show up in widely different areas of popular culture, art and academic scholarship. In this article, we explore the opportunities of the ways in which prosthesis might be a helpful and productive fi gure in relation to framing, analyzing and understanding certain healthcare-related practices that are not traditionally associated with disability. Our aim is to suggest new ways of building onto the idea of the performative value of the prosthetic fi gure and its logics as a continuum through which very different forms of embodied practices could be meaningfully understood and analyzed. Thus, we argue that the logic of the prosthesis can be helpful in uncovering tensions related to idealistic and dominant ideas about health and embodiment. First, we engage with the theoretical discussions from cultural studies, including critical disability studies, in which we broaden the scope of the concept of prosthesis. Second, we introduce and discuss two illustrative case examples in the form of dance therapeutic practices for people with Parkinson’s disease and group therapeutic practices in male-friendly spaces. In doing so, we seek to raise new questions about the ongoing cultivation of bodily and health-related interventions through the lens of the prosthetic spectrum, which we have labelled embodied practices of prosthesis. Maria Bee Christensen-StrynøCamilla Bruun EriksenThe Royal Danish Libraryarticleprosthesisembodied practicesdisabilitytherapeutic and healthcare-related interventionsSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Vol 31, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DA
EN
NB
SV
topic prosthesis
embodied practices
disability
therapeutic and healthcare-related interventions
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle prosthesis
embodied practices
disability
therapeutic and healthcare-related interventions
Social Sciences
H
Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø
Camilla Bruun Eriksen
Embodied practices of prosthesis
description While the prosthesis is often thought of as a technology or an artefact used to ‘fix’ or make ‘whole’ a disabled body, it has also become an important figuration and metaphor for thinking about disabled embodiment as an emblematic manifestation of bodily difference and mobility. Furthermore, the ambiguity and broadness of prosthesis as an object and a concept, as well as its potential as a theoretical and analytical thinking tool, show up in widely different areas of popular culture, art and academic scholarship. In this article, we explore the opportunities of the ways in which prosthesis might be a helpful and productive fi gure in relation to framing, analyzing and understanding certain healthcare-related practices that are not traditionally associated with disability. Our aim is to suggest new ways of building onto the idea of the performative value of the prosthetic fi gure and its logics as a continuum through which very different forms of embodied practices could be meaningfully understood and analyzed. Thus, we argue that the logic of the prosthesis can be helpful in uncovering tensions related to idealistic and dominant ideas about health and embodiment. First, we engage with the theoretical discussions from cultural studies, including critical disability studies, in which we broaden the scope of the concept of prosthesis. Second, we introduce and discuss two illustrative case examples in the form of dance therapeutic practices for people with Parkinson’s disease and group therapeutic practices in male-friendly spaces. In doing so, we seek to raise new questions about the ongoing cultivation of bodily and health-related interventions through the lens of the prosthetic spectrum, which we have labelled embodied practices of prosthesis.
format article
author Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø
Camilla Bruun Eriksen
author_facet Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø
Camilla Bruun Eriksen
author_sort Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø
title Embodied practices of prosthesis
title_short Embodied practices of prosthesis
title_full Embodied practices of prosthesis
title_fullStr Embodied practices of prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Embodied practices of prosthesis
title_sort embodied practices of prosthesis
publisher The Royal Danish Library
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1c674ff1c4954f798d561e8a5ca0fd79
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabeechristensenstrynø embodiedpracticesofprosthesis
AT camillabruuneriksen embodiedpracticesofprosthesis
_version_ 1718407210871029760