241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations

The geometry form related to 241Am/Be spontaneous neutron sources has been investigated to evaluate the most optimizing geometry for disused sealed radioactive source (DSRS) disposal. Nine source geometries were assessed: point, disk, sphere 1, sphere 2, sphere 3, cylinder 1, cylinder 2, rectangle 1...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cebastien Joel Guembou Shouop, Maurice Ndontchueng Moyo, Eric Jilbert Nguelem Mekongtso, Jean Felix Beyala Ateba, David Strivay
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: AIP Publishing LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c7b0191f36f484383fc9384e2050523
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c7b0191f36f484383fc9384e2050523
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c7b0191f36f484383fc9384e20505232021-12-01T18:52:06Z241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations2158-322610.1063/5.0063005https://doaj.org/article/1c7b0191f36f484383fc9384e20505232021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0063005https://doaj.org/toc/2158-3226The geometry form related to 241Am/Be spontaneous neutron sources has been investigated to evaluate the most optimizing geometry for disused sealed radioactive source (DSRS) disposal. Nine source geometries were assessed: point, disk, sphere 1, sphere 2, sphere 3, cylinder 1, cylinder 2, rectangle 1, and rectangle 2. The most radiological optimizing geometries were found to be the disk, followed by the point source, sphere 1, and cylinder 1, while the rectangle or parallelepiped 2 source forms were the worst cases. Neutron and photon generated fluxes were computed, and the parallelepiped 2 source geometry generated the lower value of flux inversely to the effective dose rate computed in the decision-making area, where it was found to be the highest value. The obtained results were in agreement with the as low as reasonably achievable principle for the exposure rate optimization. The obtained exposure dose rates were found to be <∼2 µSv/h (maximum value on horizontal calculation) and 1.75 µSv/h (maximum value on vertical computation), which are lower than the 2.5 µSv/h acceptable limit for the public area. Whenever possible, the DSRSs should be pressed into a disk form (or a cylindrical form with a small height) before embedding them into the Am1 P60 capsule for disposal purposes. The dose profile for the 241Am/Be source obtained, the neutron flux, and the gamma generated from neutron absorption showed agreement with the expected experimental physical data. The supported data contribute to postulate that Monte Carlo methods are effective computational tools that can be used to select the most effective radioactive waste form for disposal purposes.Cebastien Joel Guembou ShouopMaurice Ndontchueng MoyoEric Jilbert Nguelem MekongtsoJean Felix Beyala AtebaDavid StrivayAIP Publishing LLCarticlePhysicsQC1-999ENAIP Advances, Vol 11, Iss 11, Pp 115024-115024-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Cebastien Joel Guembou Shouop
Maurice Ndontchueng Moyo
Eric Jilbert Nguelem Mekongtso
Jean Felix Beyala Ateba
David Strivay
241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
description The geometry form related to 241Am/Be spontaneous neutron sources has been investigated to evaluate the most optimizing geometry for disused sealed radioactive source (DSRS) disposal. Nine source geometries were assessed: point, disk, sphere 1, sphere 2, sphere 3, cylinder 1, cylinder 2, rectangle 1, and rectangle 2. The most radiological optimizing geometries were found to be the disk, followed by the point source, sphere 1, and cylinder 1, while the rectangle or parallelepiped 2 source forms were the worst cases. Neutron and photon generated fluxes were computed, and the parallelepiped 2 source geometry generated the lower value of flux inversely to the effective dose rate computed in the decision-making area, where it was found to be the highest value. The obtained results were in agreement with the as low as reasonably achievable principle for the exposure rate optimization. The obtained exposure dose rates were found to be <∼2 µSv/h (maximum value on horizontal calculation) and 1.75 µSv/h (maximum value on vertical computation), which are lower than the 2.5 µSv/h acceptable limit for the public area. Whenever possible, the DSRSs should be pressed into a disk form (or a cylindrical form with a small height) before embedding them into the Am1 P60 capsule for disposal purposes. The dose profile for the 241Am/Be source obtained, the neutron flux, and the gamma generated from neutron absorption showed agreement with the expected experimental physical data. The supported data contribute to postulate that Monte Carlo methods are effective computational tools that can be used to select the most effective radioactive waste form for disposal purposes.
format article
author Cebastien Joel Guembou Shouop
Maurice Ndontchueng Moyo
Eric Jilbert Nguelem Mekongtso
Jean Felix Beyala Ateba
David Strivay
author_facet Cebastien Joel Guembou Shouop
Maurice Ndontchueng Moyo
Eric Jilbert Nguelem Mekongtso
Jean Felix Beyala Ateba
David Strivay
author_sort Cebastien Joel Guembou Shouop
title 241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
title_short 241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
title_full 241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
title_fullStr 241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
title_full_unstemmed 241Am/Be source optimum geometry for DSRS management-based Monte Carlo simulations
title_sort 241am/be source optimum geometry for dsrs management-based monte carlo simulations
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1c7b0191f36f484383fc9384e2050523
work_keys_str_mv AT cebastienjoelguemboushouop 241ambesourceoptimumgeometryfordsrsmanagementbasedmontecarlosimulations
AT mauricendontchuengmoyo 241ambesourceoptimumgeometryfordsrsmanagementbasedmontecarlosimulations
AT ericjilbertnguelemmekongtso 241ambesourceoptimumgeometryfordsrsmanagementbasedmontecarlosimulations
AT jeanfelixbeyalaateba 241ambesourceoptimumgeometryfordsrsmanagementbasedmontecarlosimulations
AT davidstrivay 241ambesourceoptimumgeometryfordsrsmanagementbasedmontecarlosimulations
_version_ 1718404678300991488