The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Abstract The novel coronavirus outbreak began in late December 2019 and rapidly spread worldwide, critically impacting public health systems. A number of already approved and marketed drugs are being tested for repurposing, including Favipiravir. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Favi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soheil Hassanipour, Morteza Arab-Zozani, Bahman Amani, Forough Heidarzad, Mohammad Fathalipour, Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c848e5c102c42d3ac75d1b6a3f145a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c848e5c102c42d3ac75d1b6a3f145a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c848e5c102c42d3ac75d1b6a3f145a32021-12-02T15:49:50ZThe efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials10.1038/s41598-021-90551-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1c848e5c102c42d3ac75d1b6a3f145a32021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90551-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The novel coronavirus outbreak began in late December 2019 and rapidly spread worldwide, critically impacting public health systems. A number of already approved and marketed drugs are being tested for repurposing, including Favipiravir. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19 patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We registered the protocol in the PROSPERO (CRD42020180032). All clinical trials which addressed the safety and efficacy of Favipiravir in comparison to other control groups for treatment of patients with confirmed infection with SARS-CoV2 were included. We searched electronic databases including LitCovid/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, and Scientific Information Database up to 31 December 2020. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using Cochrane Collaboration criteria. All analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 2, and the risk ratio index was calculated. Egger and Begg test was used for assessing publication bias. Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant clinical improvement in the Favipiravir group versus the control group during seven days after hospitalization (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09–1.41; P = 0.001). Viral clearance was more in 14 days after hospitalization in Favipiravir group than control group, but this finding marginally not significant (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98–1.25; P = 0.094). Requiring supplemental oxygen therapy in the Favipiravir group was 7% less than the control group, (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.67–1.28; P = 0.664). Transferred to ICU and adverse events were not statistically different between two groups. The mortality rate in the Favipiravir group was approximately 30% less than the control group, but this finding not statistically significant. Favipiravir possibly exerted no significant beneficial effect in the term of mortality in the general group of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. We should consider that perhaps the use of antiviral once the patient has symptoms is too late and this would explain their low efficacy in the clinical setting.Soheil HassanipourMorteza Arab-ZozaniBahman AmaniForough HeidarzadMohammad FathalipourRudolph Martinez-de-HoyoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Soheil Hassanipour
Morteza Arab-Zozani
Bahman Amani
Forough Heidarzad
Mohammad Fathalipour
Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
description Abstract The novel coronavirus outbreak began in late December 2019 and rapidly spread worldwide, critically impacting public health systems. A number of already approved and marketed drugs are being tested for repurposing, including Favipiravir. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19 patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We registered the protocol in the PROSPERO (CRD42020180032). All clinical trials which addressed the safety and efficacy of Favipiravir in comparison to other control groups for treatment of patients with confirmed infection with SARS-CoV2 were included. We searched electronic databases including LitCovid/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, and Scientific Information Database up to 31 December 2020. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using Cochrane Collaboration criteria. All analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 2, and the risk ratio index was calculated. Egger and Begg test was used for assessing publication bias. Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant clinical improvement in the Favipiravir group versus the control group during seven days after hospitalization (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09–1.41; P = 0.001). Viral clearance was more in 14 days after hospitalization in Favipiravir group than control group, but this finding marginally not significant (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98–1.25; P = 0.094). Requiring supplemental oxygen therapy in the Favipiravir group was 7% less than the control group, (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.67–1.28; P = 0.664). Transferred to ICU and adverse events were not statistically different between two groups. The mortality rate in the Favipiravir group was approximately 30% less than the control group, but this finding not statistically significant. Favipiravir possibly exerted no significant beneficial effect in the term of mortality in the general group of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. We should consider that perhaps the use of antiviral once the patient has symptoms is too late and this would explain their low efficacy in the clinical setting.
format article
author Soheil Hassanipour
Morteza Arab-Zozani
Bahman Amani
Forough Heidarzad
Mohammad Fathalipour
Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
author_facet Soheil Hassanipour
Morteza Arab-Zozani
Bahman Amani
Forough Heidarzad
Mohammad Fathalipour
Rudolph Martinez-de-Hoyo
author_sort Soheil Hassanipour
title The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_short The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of favipiravir in treatment of covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1c848e5c102c42d3ac75d1b6a3f145a3
work_keys_str_mv AT soheilhassanipour theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT mortezaarabzozani theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT bahmanamani theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT foroughheidarzad theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT mohammadfathalipour theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT rudolphmartinezdehoyo theefficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT soheilhassanipour efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT mortezaarabzozani efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT bahmanamani efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT foroughheidarzad efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT mohammadfathalipour efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT rudolphmartinezdehoyo efficacyandsafetyoffavipiravirintreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
_version_ 1718385676261523456