DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”

The beginning of the 1990s saw a prevailing understanding in Tokyo that restoration of trust and reconciliation with East Asian countries should be the first step to a larger role of Japan in the international politics. This understanding manifested itself in so far the most successful attempts to a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: A. A. Batakova
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1c9a4b6430224bd39675dd9d008d43a2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1c9a4b6430224bd39675dd9d008d43a2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1c9a4b6430224bd39675dd9d008d43a22021-11-23T14:51:00ZDIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2016-1-46-106-117https://doaj.org/article/1c9a4b6430224bd39675dd9d008d43a22016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/492https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The beginning of the 1990s saw a prevailing understanding in Tokyo that restoration of trust and reconciliation with East Asian countries should be the first step to a larger role of Japan in the international politics. This understanding manifested itself in so far the most successful attempts to apologize for the policies of Japan in the first half of the XX century, including Prime Minister T.Murayama's statement, issued in 1995, as well as measures to address the so-called"historical issues". By contrast, incumbent Prime Minister S.Abe, who is also striving to increase the role of Japan in the international arena, shows a gradual departure from the above-mentioned strategy on presumption that a "masochistic" view of Japanese history runs counter to its national interests. His statement on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II promoted a thesis on importance to lift "the burden of apologies". Given the fact that it was nevertheless received positively by Tokyo's main ally Washington and did not become an obstacle to political dialogue with Seoul and Beijing, the author suggests that S.Abe will continue step-by-step efforts to remove "historical issues" from the bilateral political and economic agenda with China and South Korea, as well as to erase the link between the necessity to issue apologies, characteristic of the Japanese diplomacy of the 1990s, and a strategy to a larger Japan's role in international politics and security.A. A. BatakovaMGIMO University Pressarticlejapan-chinese relationsjapan-south korean relationsforeign policy of japan"apology diplomacy""history issues" of japanshinzo abetomiichi murayamaInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 1(46), Pp 106-117 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic japan-chinese relations
japan-south korean relations
foreign policy of japan
"apology diplomacy"
"history issues" of japan
shinzo abe
tomiichi murayama
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle japan-chinese relations
japan-south korean relations
foreign policy of japan
"apology diplomacy"
"history issues" of japan
shinzo abe
tomiichi murayama
International relations
JZ2-6530
A. A. Batakova
DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
description The beginning of the 1990s saw a prevailing understanding in Tokyo that restoration of trust and reconciliation with East Asian countries should be the first step to a larger role of Japan in the international politics. This understanding manifested itself in so far the most successful attempts to apologize for the policies of Japan in the first half of the XX century, including Prime Minister T.Murayama's statement, issued in 1995, as well as measures to address the so-called"historical issues". By contrast, incumbent Prime Minister S.Abe, who is also striving to increase the role of Japan in the international arena, shows a gradual departure from the above-mentioned strategy on presumption that a "masochistic" view of Japanese history runs counter to its national interests. His statement on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II promoted a thesis on importance to lift "the burden of apologies". Given the fact that it was nevertheless received positively by Tokyo's main ally Washington and did not become an obstacle to political dialogue with Seoul and Beijing, the author suggests that S.Abe will continue step-by-step efforts to remove "historical issues" from the bilateral political and economic agenda with China and South Korea, as well as to erase the link between the necessity to issue apologies, characteristic of the Japanese diplomacy of the 1990s, and a strategy to a larger Japan's role in international politics and security.
format article
author A. A. Batakova
author_facet A. A. Batakova
author_sort A. A. Batakova
title DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
title_short DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
title_full DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
title_fullStr DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
title_full_unstemmed DIFFERING APPROACHES OF THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT TOWARDS THE “HISTORY ISSUES”
title_sort differing approaches of the japanese government towards the “history issues”
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/1c9a4b6430224bd39675dd9d008d43a2
work_keys_str_mv AT aabatakova differingapproachesofthejapanesegovernmenttowardsthehistoryissues
_version_ 1718416260283236352