High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes

Background: Medical students are anxious about not getting a preferred residency position.  We described elective patterns of two recent cohorts and examined associated match outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the final-year electives of all students who participated in th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carol Ann Courneya, Winson Y. Cheung, Janette McMillan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1ca03259fe2e4bb0af7df138c18d6ae1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1ca03259fe2e4bb0af7df138c18d6ae1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1ca03259fe2e4bb0af7df138c18d6ae12021-12-01T22:43:45ZHigh dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes10.36834/cmej.530181923-1202https://doaj.org/article/1ca03259fe2e4bb0af7df138c18d6ae12019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/53018https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202 Background: Medical students are anxious about not getting a preferred residency position.  We described elective patterns of two recent cohorts and examined associated match outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the final-year electives of all students who participated in the residency match (first iteration) at one school for 2017 and 2018.  We categorized elective patterns and associated them with aggregated match outcomes. We examined high-demand/low-supply (HDLS) disciplines separately. Results: We described three elective patterns: High Dive, Parallel Plan(s), and No Clear Pattern. Many students had High Dive and Parallel Plans patterns; only a few showed No Clear Pattern. Match rates for High Dive and Parallel Plan patterns were high but many students matched to Family and Internal Medicine.  When we separated out HDLS predominance, the match rate remained high but a significant number matched to disciplines in which they did not have a majority of electives. Most High Dive and Parallel Plan students who went unmatched did so with HDLS discipline electives.  Conclusion: Many students chose High Dive and Parallel Plan strategies to both high-capacity and HDLS disciplines. Match rates were high for both patterns but students also matched to non-primary disciplines.  Back-up planning may reside in the entire application, and not just electives selection. Carol Ann CourneyaWinson Y. CheungJanette McMillanCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 11, Iss 3 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Carol Ann Courneya
Winson Y. Cheung
Janette McMillan
High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
description Background: Medical students are anxious about not getting a preferred residency position.  We described elective patterns of two recent cohorts and examined associated match outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the final-year electives of all students who participated in the residency match (first iteration) at one school for 2017 and 2018.  We categorized elective patterns and associated them with aggregated match outcomes. We examined high-demand/low-supply (HDLS) disciplines separately. Results: We described three elective patterns: High Dive, Parallel Plan(s), and No Clear Pattern. Many students had High Dive and Parallel Plans patterns; only a few showed No Clear Pattern. Match rates for High Dive and Parallel Plan patterns were high but many students matched to Family and Internal Medicine.  When we separated out HDLS predominance, the match rate remained high but a significant number matched to disciplines in which they did not have a majority of electives. Most High Dive and Parallel Plan students who went unmatched did so with HDLS discipline electives.  Conclusion: Many students chose High Dive and Parallel Plan strategies to both high-capacity and HDLS disciplines. Match rates were high for both patterns but students also matched to non-primary disciplines.  Back-up planning may reside in the entire application, and not just electives selection.
format article
author Carol Ann Courneya
Winson Y. Cheung
Janette McMillan
author_facet Carol Ann Courneya
Winson Y. Cheung
Janette McMillan
author_sort Carol Ann Courneya
title High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
title_short High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
title_full High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
title_fullStr High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
title_full_unstemmed High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
title_sort high dives and parallel plans: relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/1ca03259fe2e4bb0af7df138c18d6ae1
work_keys_str_mv AT carolanncourneya highdivesandparallelplansrelationshipsbetweenmedicalstudentelectivestrategiesandresidencymatchoutcomes
AT winsonycheung highdivesandparallelplansrelationshipsbetweenmedicalstudentelectivestrategiesandresidencymatchoutcomes
AT janettemcmillan highdivesandparallelplansrelationshipsbetweenmedicalstudentelectivestrategiesandresidencymatchoutcomes
_version_ 1718404028468035584