Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold

This article examines the ideological position of Indonesia’s political parties in addressing the 2019 presidential threshold under the open-list proportional representation system. The article aims to determine the political cleavage among Indonesian political parties, whether classified into the i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Ridho Al-Hamdi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Universitas Gadjah Mada 2021
Materias:	presidential threshold parties 2019 election ideological cleavage indonesia Political science (General) JA1-92 Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1cf96e81d6824435b250f9cad4d09328
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1cf96e81d6824435b250f9cad4d09328
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1cf96e81d6824435b250f9cad4d093282021-12-02T14:54:54ZIdeological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold1410-49462502-788310.22146/jsp.53514https://doaj.org/article/1cf96e81d6824435b250f9cad4d093282021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/53514https://doaj.org/toc/1410-4946https://doaj.org/toc/2502-7883This article examines the ideological position of Indonesia’s political parties in addressing the 2019 presidential threshold under the open-list proportional representation system. The article aims to determine the political cleavage among Indonesian political parties, whether classified into the ideological spectrum or the organisational degree. From a methodological standpoint, it is qualitative research by employing in-depth interviews and online news collection as a data gathering technique. The study’s finding depicts that the ideological cleavage is no longer relevant under the open-list proportional representation system because political parties eventually have pragmatical orientations rather than ideological onsiderations. It can be proven that the position of nationalist secular parties is not merely in the approval side but also in the denial and dilemma sides. Likewise, the position of nationalist Islamist parties can be found on two sides: denial and dilemma. This finding verifies that Indonesia’s ideological contestation is waning and inactive when political parties cope with power issues. On the contrary, the ideology is revived when it deals with religious and tribal affairs.Ridho Al-HamdiUniversitas Gadjah Madaarticlepresidential thresholdparties2019 electionideological cleavageindonesiaPolitical science (General)JA1-92Social sciences (General)H1-99ENJSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol 24, Iss 3, Pp 205-219 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	presidential threshold parties 2019 election ideological cleavage indonesia Political science (General) JA1-92 Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	presidential threshold parties 2019 election ideological cleavage indonesia Political science (General) JA1-92 Social sciences (General) H1-99 Ridho Al-Hamdi Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
description	This article examines the ideological position of Indonesia’s political parties in addressing the 2019 presidential threshold under the open-list proportional representation system. The article aims to determine the political cleavage among Indonesian political parties, whether classified into the ideological spectrum or the organisational degree. From a methodological standpoint, it is qualitative research by employing in-depth interviews and online news collection as a data gathering technique. The study’s finding depicts that the ideological cleavage is no longer relevant under the open-list proportional representation system because political parties eventually have pragmatical orientations rather than ideological onsiderations. It can be proven that the position of nationalist secular parties is not merely in the approval side but also in the denial and dilemma sides. Likewise, the position of nationalist Islamist parties can be found on two sides: denial and dilemma. This finding verifies that Indonesia’s ideological contestation is waning and inactive when political parties cope with power issues. On the contrary, the ideology is revived when it deals with religious and tribal affairs.
format	article
author	Ridho Al-Hamdi
author_facet	Ridho Al-Hamdi
author_sort	Ridho Al-Hamdi
title	Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
title_short	Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
title_full	Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
title_fullStr	Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
title_full_unstemmed	Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold
title_sort	ideological cleavage under open-list proportional representation: parties’ position toward the 2019 indonesian presidential threshold
publisher	Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1cf96e81d6824435b250f9cad4d09328
work_keys_str_mv	AT ridhoalhamdi ideologicalcleavageunderopenlistproportionalrepresentationpartiespositiontowardthe2019indonesianpresidentialthreshold
_version_	1718389311019155456

Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold

Ejemplares similares