Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?

Abstract The most common formsof S fertilizers in the northern Great Plains are ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium thiosulfate (ATS), and elemental S (ES). Among these, AS is preferred over the others because of its readily available SO42– form, and it can be blended with other dry fertilizer granules,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Diksha Goyal, David W. Franzen, Amitava Chatterjee
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	Agriculture S Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1d0485127b104ef18e7d8556560ed8ed
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1d0485127b104ef18e7d8556560ed8ed
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1d0485127b104ef18e7d8556560ed8ed2021-11-24T11:36:03ZDo crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?2639-669610.1002/agg2.20201https://doaj.org/article/1d0485127b104ef18e7d8556560ed8ed2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20201https://doaj.org/toc/2639-6696Abstract The most common formsof S fertilizers in the northern Great Plains are ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium thiosulfate (ATS), and elemental S (ES). Among these, AS is preferred over the others because of its readily available SO42– form, and it can be blended with other dry fertilizer granules, but SO42– is prone to leaching. Recently, fertilizer industries introduced micronized (<100 μm) S (MS) fertilizer formulations to hope that the smaller elemental S particles would increase the rate of S oxidation. Across the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota, field trials were conducted to compare the response of corn (Zea mays L.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to the application of different forms of S (AS, ATS, mono ammonium phosphate or MAP‐10S [5% ES + 5% AS], MAP + MS, AS + MS, muriate of potash [MOP] + MS, urea ammonium nitrate [UAN] + MS). Spring wheat only had a significant positive response to S forms, with ATS having the highest grain yield in 2019, significantly higher than AS and AS + MS. In 2020, UAN + MS had the highest grain yield, only higher than the control. Corn and sugar beet did not respond to addition of or to S forms. Corn, sugar beet, and spring wheat yields were indifferent to supply and forms of S in the Red River Valley.Diksha GoyalDavid W. FranzenAmitava ChatterjeeWileyarticleAgricultureSEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Agriculture S Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	Agriculture S Environmental sciences GE1-350 Diksha Goyal David W. Franzen Amitava Chatterjee Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
description	Abstract The most common formsof S fertilizers in the northern Great Plains are ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium thiosulfate (ATS), and elemental S (ES). Among these, AS is preferred over the others because of its readily available SO42– form, and it can be blended with other dry fertilizer granules, but SO42– is prone to leaching. Recently, fertilizer industries introduced micronized (<100 μm) S (MS) fertilizer formulations to hope that the smaller elemental S particles would increase the rate of S oxidation. Across the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota, field trials were conducted to compare the response of corn (Zea mays L.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to the application of different forms of S (AS, ATS, mono ammonium phosphate or MAP‐10S [5% ES + 5% AS], MAP + MS, AS + MS, muriate of potash [MOP] + MS, urea ammonium nitrate [UAN] + MS). Spring wheat only had a significant positive response to S forms, with ATS having the highest grain yield in 2019, significantly higher than AS and AS + MS. In 2020, UAN + MS had the highest grain yield, only higher than the control. Corn and sugar beet did not respond to addition of or to S forms. Corn, sugar beet, and spring wheat yields were indifferent to supply and forms of S in the Red River Valley.
format	article
author	Diksha Goyal David W. Franzen Amitava Chatterjee
author_facet	Diksha Goyal David W. Franzen Amitava Chatterjee
author_sort	Diksha Goyal
title	Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
title_short	Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
title_full	Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
title_fullStr	Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
title_full_unstemmed	Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
title_sort	do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1d0485127b104ef18e7d8556560ed8ed
work_keys_str_mv	AT dikshagoyal docropsresponsestosulfurvarywithitsforms AT davidwfranzen docropsresponsestosulfurvarywithitsforms AT amitavachatterjee docropsresponsestosulfurvarywithitsforms
_version_	1718415035077754880

Do crops' responses to sulfur vary with its forms?

Ejemplares similares