COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS

In this study, three road rating systems were assessed and compared after carefully applying them to five major road case studies. The essence of these rating systems is to provide a consistent, reasonably objective and systematic approach for establishing priorities and scheduling and budgeting ro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWO
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Alma Mater Publishing House "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau 2016
Materias:	rating systems roadway rehabilitation road condition pavement distresses Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1d2d1980e69642cd97e2985e4a0dc759
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1d2d1980e69642cd97e2985e4a0dc759
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1d2d1980e69642cd97e2985e4a0dc7592021-12-02T19:49:54ZCOMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS10.29081/jesr.v22i2.1072068-75592344-4932https://doaj.org/article/1d2d1980e69642cd97e2985e4a0dc7592016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jesr.ub.ro/1/article/view/107https://doaj.org/toc/2068-7559https://doaj.org/toc/2344-4932 In this study, three road rating systems were assessed and compared after carefully applying them to five major road case studies. The essence of these rating systems is to provide a consistent, reasonably objective and systematic approach for establishing priorities and scheduling and budgeting roadway rehabilitation requirements. The effectiveness of these systems was measured during the road condition survey and compared with one another. The most effective system out of the three was determined based on the different types and severity levels of pavement distresses identified for the five different routes. OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWOAlma Mater Publishing House "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacauarticlerating systemsroadway rehabilitationroad conditionpavement distressesTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENJournal of Engineering Studies and Research, Vol 22, Iss 2 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	rating systems roadway rehabilitation road condition pavement distresses Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040
spellingShingle	rating systems roadway rehabilitation road condition pavement distresses Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWO COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
description	In this study, three road rating systems were assessed and compared after carefully applying them to five major road case studies. The essence of these rating systems is to provide a consistent, reasonably objective and systematic approach for establishing priorities and scheduling and budgeting roadway rehabilitation requirements. The effectiveness of these systems was measured during the road condition survey and compared with one another. The most effective system out of the three was determined based on the different types and severity levels of pavement distresses identified for the five different routes.
format	article
author	OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWO
author_facet	OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWO
author_sort	OLUFIKAYO ADERINLEWO
title	COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
title_short	COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
title_full	COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
title_fullStr	COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
title_full_unstemmed	COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS
title_sort	comparative assessment of road rating systems
publisher	Alma Mater Publishing House "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/1d2d1980e69642cd97e2985e4a0dc759
work_keys_str_mv	AT olufikayoaderinlewo comparativeassessmentofroadratingsystems
_version_	1718375947162353664

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD RATING SYSTEMS

Ejemplares similares