Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Cop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathiesen AS, Egerod I, Jensen T, Kaldan G, Langberg H, Thomsen T
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db82021-12-02T03:33:26ZPsychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis1178-7007https://doaj.org/article/1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db82018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/psychosocial-interventions-for-reducing-diabetes-distress-in-vulnerabl-peer-reviewed-article-DMSOhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-7007Anne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4CopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract: Diabetes distress (DD) disproportionately affects vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and interventions targeting this population are therefore relevant. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the evidence for an effect of psychosocial interventions for reducing DD, and, secondly HbA1c, depression, and health-related quality of life in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vulnerability encompasses poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7.5%) and at least one additional risk factor for poor diabetes outcomes such as low educational level, comorbidity, and risky lifestyle behavior. The interventions should be theoretically founded and include cognition- or emotion-focused elements. We systematically searched four databases for articles published between January 1995 and March 2018. Eighteen studies testing a variety of psychosocial interventions in 4,066 patients were included. We adhered to the Cochrane methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data extraction and risk of bias assessment, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for assessing the quality of the evidence. Data were pooled using the fixed or random effects method as appropriate. We investigated effects of individual vs group, intensive vs brief interventions, and interventions with and without motivational interviewing in subgroup analyses. To assess the robustness of effect estimates, sensitivity analyses excluding studies with high risk of bias and attrition >20% were conducted. We found low to moderate quality evidence for a significant small effect of psychosocial interventions on DD, and very low to moderate quality evidence for no effect on HbA1c, both outcomes assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. The effect on depression was small, while there was no effect on health-related quality of life. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that interventions using motivational interviewing and individual interventions were associated with incremental effects on DD. Likewise, intensive interventions were associated with significant reductions in both DD and HbA1c. Keywords: diabetes distress, HbA1c, meta-analysis, psychosocial interventions, type 2 diabetes, vulnerable populationsMathiesen ASEgerod IJensen TKaldan GLangberg HThomsen TDove Medical PressarticleDiabetes distressHbA1cMeta-analysisPsychosocial interventionsType 2 diabetesVulnerable populationsSpecialties of internal medicineRC581-951ENDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, Vol Volume 12, Pp 19-33 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diabetes distress
HbA1c
Meta-analysis
Psychosocial interventions
Type 2 diabetes
Vulnerable populations
Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
spellingShingle Diabetes distress
HbA1c
Meta-analysis
Psychosocial interventions
Type 2 diabetes
Vulnerable populations
Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description Anne Sophie Mathiesen,1 Ingrid Egerod,2 Tonny Jensen,1 Gudrun Kaldan,3 Henning Langberg,4 Thordis Thomsen3 1Department of Endocrinology, Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Intensive Care Unit 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Abdominal Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4CopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract: Diabetes distress (DD) disproportionately affects vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and interventions targeting this population are therefore relevant. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the evidence for an effect of psychosocial interventions for reducing DD, and, secondly HbA1c, depression, and health-related quality of life in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vulnerability encompasses poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7.5%) and at least one additional risk factor for poor diabetes outcomes such as low educational level, comorbidity, and risky lifestyle behavior. The interventions should be theoretically founded and include cognition- or emotion-focused elements. We systematically searched four databases for articles published between January 1995 and March 2018. Eighteen studies testing a variety of psychosocial interventions in 4,066 patients were included. We adhered to the Cochrane methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data extraction and risk of bias assessment, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation for assessing the quality of the evidence. Data were pooled using the fixed or random effects method as appropriate. We investigated effects of individual vs group, intensive vs brief interventions, and interventions with and without motivational interviewing in subgroup analyses. To assess the robustness of effect estimates, sensitivity analyses excluding studies with high risk of bias and attrition >20% were conducted. We found low to moderate quality evidence for a significant small effect of psychosocial interventions on DD, and very low to moderate quality evidence for no effect on HbA1c, both outcomes assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. The effect on depression was small, while there was no effect on health-related quality of life. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that interventions using motivational interviewing and individual interventions were associated with incremental effects on DD. Likewise, intensive interventions were associated with significant reductions in both DD and HbA1c. Keywords: diabetes distress, HbA1c, meta-analysis, psychosocial interventions, type 2 diabetes, vulnerable populations
format article
author Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
author_facet Mathiesen AS
Egerod I
Jensen T
Kaldan G
Langberg H
Thomsen T
author_sort Mathiesen AS
title Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/1d2e8a841c9e466b9f26766a44517db8
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiesenas psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT egerodi psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jensent psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaldang psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langbergh psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomsent psychosocialinterventionsforreducingdiabetesdistressinvulnerablepeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718401717014364160