Preoperative factors predictive of postoperative decimal visual acuity ≥ 1.0 following surgical treatment for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Hiroshi Kunikata1, Toshiaki Abe2, Jiro Kinukawa1, Kohji Nishida1,31Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; 2Division of Clinical Cell Therapy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; 3Department of Ophthalmol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiroshi Kunikata, Toshiaki Abe, Jiro Kinukawa, et al
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1d2fc4081b514b89827991d54339eb6e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Hiroshi Kunikata1, Toshiaki Abe2, Jiro Kinukawa1, Kohji Nishida1,31Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; 2Division of Clinical Cell Therapy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Medical School, Suita, JapanPurpose: To report the preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and foveal thickness (FT) values that lead to a postoperative decimal BCVA of ≥ 1.0 after surgical removal of an idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM).Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 73 eyes that underwent surgery for removal of an idiopathic ERM. All eyes had been treated by a single surgeon using a 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peel. The BCVA and FT were measured at baseline and 6 months postoperatively.Results: A postoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 1.0 was obtained in eyes with a preoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 0.3 but not in those with a preoperative decimal BCVA ≤ 0.2. The incidence of obtaining a postoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 1.0 was significantly (P = 0.002) higher in eyes with a preoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 0.5 (50%) than in eyes with a preoperative decimal BCVA < 0.5 (11%). Additionally, a postoperative decimal BCVA of ≥ 1.0 was obtained in 51% of the eyes that had a preoperative FT < 400 µm, compared with only 21% of eyes with a preoperative FT ≥ 400 µm (P = 0.01). The incidence of obtaining a postoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 1.0 was significantly higher in eyes with preoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 0.5 and FT < 400 µm (60%) than in eyes with preoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 0.5 and FT ≥ 400 µm (20%; P = 0.03 ) or preoperative BCVA < 0.5 and FT ≥ 400 µm (7%; P < 0.001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that eyes with both preoperative BCVA ≥ 0.5 and FT < 400 µm have a significantly better chance of obtaining a postoperative decimal BCVA ≥ 1.0 following idiopathic ERM removal.Keywords: 25-gauge vitrectomy, optical coherence tomography, epimacular membrane, epiretinal membrane, visual acuity, foveal thickness