Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements

This paper contributes to the discussion of fuzzy boundaries by investigating negative assessments of the recipient and non-present parties that are syntactically incomplete. Particularly, it explores how the speaker uses syntax and bodily visual conduct to accomplish the delicate action of negative...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Li Xiaoting
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1d45b0bbf6fe407e843ea91f6dd97bcd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1d45b0bbf6fe407e843ea91f6dd97bcd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1d45b0bbf6fe407e843ea91f6dd97bcd2021-12-05T14:11:00ZMultimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements2300-996910.1515/opli-2020-0164https://doaj.org/article/1d45b0bbf6fe407e843ea91f6dd97bcd2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0164https://doaj.org/toc/2300-9969This paper contributes to the discussion of fuzzy boundaries by investigating negative assessments of the recipient and non-present parties that are syntactically incomplete. Particularly, it explores how the speaker uses syntax and bodily visual conduct to accomplish the delicate action of negatively assessing others and to solicit the recipient to collaboratively complete negative assessments. Based on an examination of approximately 5 h of everyday Mandarin face-to-face conversations, the study shows that incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head shakes constitute multimodal practices in making negative assessments of the recipient and a non-present third party. Leaving assessments syntactically incomplete and displaying negative evaluative stance through facial expressions such as lip-pursing and eyebrow furrows and head shakes show the speaker’s orientation to the negative assessments as a delicate action. The facial expressions after incomplete syntax demonstrate that participants orient to the hesitation in the delivery of a TCU/turn-in-progress not as production problem, but rather an interactional problem. This study shows that the boundaries of assessment turns may be blurry, and that one assessment may be collaboratively produced by two participants, which exemplifies a specific aspect of weak cesuras and fuzzy boundaries of units and actions in interaction.Li XiaotingDe Gruyterarticleincomplete syntaxfacial expressionshead shakesnegative assessmentsdelicate actionPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENOpen Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 549-568 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic incomplete syntax
facial expressions
head shakes
negative assessments
delicate action
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle incomplete syntax
facial expressions
head shakes
negative assessments
delicate action
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Li Xiaoting
Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
description This paper contributes to the discussion of fuzzy boundaries by investigating negative assessments of the recipient and non-present parties that are syntactically incomplete. Particularly, it explores how the speaker uses syntax and bodily visual conduct to accomplish the delicate action of negatively assessing others and to solicit the recipient to collaboratively complete negative assessments. Based on an examination of approximately 5 h of everyday Mandarin face-to-face conversations, the study shows that incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head shakes constitute multimodal practices in making negative assessments of the recipient and a non-present third party. Leaving assessments syntactically incomplete and displaying negative evaluative stance through facial expressions such as lip-pursing and eyebrow furrows and head shakes show the speaker’s orientation to the negative assessments as a delicate action. The facial expressions after incomplete syntax demonstrate that participants orient to the hesitation in the delivery of a TCU/turn-in-progress not as production problem, but rather an interactional problem. This study shows that the boundaries of assessment turns may be blurry, and that one assessment may be collaboratively produced by two participants, which exemplifies a specific aspect of weak cesuras and fuzzy boundaries of units and actions in interaction.
format article
author Li Xiaoting
author_facet Li Xiaoting
author_sort Li Xiaoting
title Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
title_short Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
title_full Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
title_fullStr Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
title_sort multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1d45b0bbf6fe407e843ea91f6dd97bcd
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaoting multimodalpracticesfornegativeassessmentsasdelicatemattersincompletesyntaxfacialexpressionsandheadmovements
_version_ 1718371462770851840