Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.

A reanalysis of existing data suggests that the established tenet of increasing efficiency of transport with body size in terrestrial locomotion requires re-evaluation. Here, the statistical model that described the data best indicated a dichotomy between the data for small (<1 kg) and large anim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert L Nudds, Jonathan R Codd, William I Sellers
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1d6d0d4fe20d4526b9a5b21b77a0e8e2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1d6d0d4fe20d4526b9a5b21b77a0e8e2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1d6d0d4fe20d4526b9a5b21b77a0e8e22021-11-25T06:20:33ZEvidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0006927https://doaj.org/article/1d6d0d4fe20d4526b9a5b21b77a0e8e22009-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19738898/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203A reanalysis of existing data suggests that the established tenet of increasing efficiency of transport with body size in terrestrial locomotion requires re-evaluation. Here, the statistical model that described the data best indicated a dichotomy between the data for small (<1 kg) and large animals (>1 kg). Within and between these two size groups there was no detectable difference in the scaling exponents (slopes) relating metabolic (E(met)) and mechanical costs (E(mech, CM)) of locomotion to body mass (M(b)). Therefore, no scaling of efficiency (E(mech, CM)/E(met)) with M(b) was evident within each size group. Small animals, however, appeared to be generally less efficient than larger animals (7% and 26% respectively). Consequently, it is possible that the relationship between efficiency and M(b) is not continuous, but, rather, involves a step-change. This step-change in the efficiency of locomotion mirrors previous findings suggesting a postural cause for an apparent size dichotomy in the relationship between E(met) and M(b). Currently data for E(mech, CM) is lacking, but the relationship between efficiency in terrestrial locomotion and M(b) is likely to be determined by posture and kinematics rather than body size alone. Hence, scaling of efficiency is likely to be more complex than a simple linear relationship across body sizes. A homogenous study of the mechanical cost of terrestrial locomotion across a broad range of species, body sizes, and importantly locomotor postures is a priority for future research.Robert L NuddsJonathan R CoddWilliam I SellersPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 4, Iss 9, p e6927 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Robert L Nudds
Jonathan R Codd
William I Sellers
Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
description A reanalysis of existing data suggests that the established tenet of increasing efficiency of transport with body size in terrestrial locomotion requires re-evaluation. Here, the statistical model that described the data best indicated a dichotomy between the data for small (<1 kg) and large animals (>1 kg). Within and between these two size groups there was no detectable difference in the scaling exponents (slopes) relating metabolic (E(met)) and mechanical costs (E(mech, CM)) of locomotion to body mass (M(b)). Therefore, no scaling of efficiency (E(mech, CM)/E(met)) with M(b) was evident within each size group. Small animals, however, appeared to be generally less efficient than larger animals (7% and 26% respectively). Consequently, it is possible that the relationship between efficiency and M(b) is not continuous, but, rather, involves a step-change. This step-change in the efficiency of locomotion mirrors previous findings suggesting a postural cause for an apparent size dichotomy in the relationship between E(met) and M(b). Currently data for E(mech, CM) is lacking, but the relationship between efficiency in terrestrial locomotion and M(b) is likely to be determined by posture and kinematics rather than body size alone. Hence, scaling of efficiency is likely to be more complex than a simple linear relationship across body sizes. A homogenous study of the mechanical cost of terrestrial locomotion across a broad range of species, body sizes, and importantly locomotor postures is a priority for future research.
format article
author Robert L Nudds
Jonathan R Codd
William I Sellers
author_facet Robert L Nudds
Jonathan R Codd
William I Sellers
author_sort Robert L Nudds
title Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
title_short Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
title_full Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
title_fullStr Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
title_sort evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/1d6d0d4fe20d4526b9a5b21b77a0e8e2
work_keys_str_mv AT robertlnudds evidenceforamassdependentstepchangeinthescalingofefficiencyinterrestriallocomotion
AT jonathanrcodd evidenceforamassdependentstepchangeinthescalingofefficiencyinterrestriallocomotion
AT williamisellers evidenceforamassdependentstepchangeinthescalingofefficiencyinterrestriallocomotion
_version_ 1718413789699768320