Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?

Understanding hominin expansions requires the comprehension of movement processes at different scales. In many models of hominin expansion these processes are viewed as being determined by large-scale effects, such as changes in climate and vegetation spanning continents and thousands or even millio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ericson Hölzchen, Christine Hertler, Ana Mateos, Jesús Rodríguez, Jan Ole Berndt, Ingo J Timm
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1d885c55b9dc4164b41ede75d165cdb7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1d885c55b9dc4164b41ede75d165cdb7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1d885c55b9dc4164b41ede75d165cdb72021-12-02T20:09:50ZDiscovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252885https://doaj.org/article/1d885c55b9dc4164b41ede75d165cdb72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252885https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Understanding hominin expansions requires the comprehension of movement processes at different scales. In many models of hominin expansion these processes are viewed as being determined by large-scale effects, such as changes in climate and vegetation spanning continents and thousands or even millions of years. However, these large-scale patterns of expansions also need to be considered as possibly resulting from the accumulation of small-scale decisions of individual hominins. Moving on a continental scale may for instance involve crossing a water barrier. We present a generalized agent-based model for simulating the crossing of a water barrier where the agents represent the hominin individuals. The model can be configured to represent a variety of movement modes across water. Here, we compare four different behavioral scenarios in conjunction with a set of water barrier configurations, in which agents move in water by either paddling, drifting, swimming or rafting. We introduce the crossing-success-rate (CSR) to quantify the performance in water crossing. Our study suggests that more focus should be directed towards the exploration of behavioral models for hominins, as directionality may be a more powerful factor for crossing a barrier than environmental opportunities alone. A prerequisite for this is to perceive the opposite shore. Furthermore, to provide a comprehensive understanding of hominin expansions, the CSR allows for the integration of results obtained from small-scale simulations into large-scale models for hominin expansion.Ericson HölzchenChristine HertlerAna MateosJesús RodríguezJan Ole BerndtIngo J TimmPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0252885 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ericson Hölzchen
Christine Hertler
Ana Mateos
Jesús Rodríguez
Jan Ole Berndt
Ingo J Timm
Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
description Understanding hominin expansions requires the comprehension of movement processes at different scales. In many models of hominin expansion these processes are viewed as being determined by large-scale effects, such as changes in climate and vegetation spanning continents and thousands or even millions of years. However, these large-scale patterns of expansions also need to be considered as possibly resulting from the accumulation of small-scale decisions of individual hominins. Moving on a continental scale may for instance involve crossing a water barrier. We present a generalized agent-based model for simulating the crossing of a water barrier where the agents represent the hominin individuals. The model can be configured to represent a variety of movement modes across water. Here, we compare four different behavioral scenarios in conjunction with a set of water barrier configurations, in which agents move in water by either paddling, drifting, swimming or rafting. We introduce the crossing-success-rate (CSR) to quantify the performance in water crossing. Our study suggests that more focus should be directed towards the exploration of behavioral models for hominins, as directionality may be a more powerful factor for crossing a barrier than environmental opportunities alone. A prerequisite for this is to perceive the opposite shore. Furthermore, to provide a comprehensive understanding of hominin expansions, the CSR allows for the integration of results obtained from small-scale simulations into large-scale models for hominin expansion.
format article
author Ericson Hölzchen
Christine Hertler
Ana Mateos
Jesús Rodríguez
Jan Ole Berndt
Ingo J Timm
author_facet Ericson Hölzchen
Christine Hertler
Ana Mateos
Jesús Rodríguez
Jan Ole Berndt
Ingo J Timm
author_sort Ericson Hölzchen
title Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
title_short Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
title_full Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
title_fullStr Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
title_full_unstemmed Discovering the opposite shore: How did hominins cross sea straits?
title_sort discovering the opposite shore: how did hominins cross sea straits?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1d885c55b9dc4164b41ede75d165cdb7
work_keys_str_mv AT ericsonholzchen discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
AT christinehertler discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
AT anamateos discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
AT jesusrodriguez discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
AT janoleberndt discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
AT ingojtimm discoveringtheoppositeshorehowdidhomininscrossseastraits
_version_ 1718375048559984640