Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels

<span class="abs_content">In this paper, I combine urban regime analysis and financialisation scholarships to uncover the role of planning and question the role of state actors in urban development processes. Through an analysis of CityLife in Milan and Tour and Taxis in Brussels, I...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Veronica Conte
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Coordinamento SIBA 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1da2035d21f74ef2a67e66049bed15d1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1da2035d21f74ef2a67e66049bed15d1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1da2035d21f74ef2a67e66049bed15d12021-11-21T15:11:42ZPlanning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels1972-76232035-660910.1285/i20356609v14i2p829https://doaj.org/article/1da2035d21f74ef2a67e66049bed15d12021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/24261https://doaj.org/toc/1972-7623https://doaj.org/toc/2035-6609<span class="abs_content">In this paper, I combine urban regime analysis and financialisation scholarships to uncover the role of planning and question the role of state actors in urban development processes. Through an analysis of CityLife in Milan and Tour and Taxis in Brussels, I argue that state actors have a strong agency in decision making as they own a critical resource: planning. My investigation reveals that, in projects characterised by uncertainty and internal conflicts, planning functions as a glue of development coalitions. Local governments mobilise it to bring together private and public interests, in order to achieve their agendas. Nevertheless, this glue function plays out differently in Milan and Brussels. While in Milan local administrations used planning to facilitate the anchoring of capital, in Brussels local governments enacted planning to shift the balance of power between them. This outcome reveals contextual differences that ultimately depend on local governance settings and planning systems. The comparison depicts the making of two different development regimes. CityLife indicates a financialised turn in governance, in which planning choices are driven mainly by economic – and financial – imperatives. Tour and Taxis symbolises an experimental entrepreneurial urban regime, a sort of "laboratory" to test new governance and planning frameworks.</span><br />Veronica ConteCoordinamento SIBAarticlebrusselsdevelopment regimemilanplanningurban development projectsPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPartecipazione e Conflitto, Vol 14, Iss 2, Pp 829-847 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic brussels
development regime
milan
planning
urban development projects
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle brussels
development regime
milan
planning
urban development projects
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Veronica Conte
Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
description <span class="abs_content">In this paper, I combine urban regime analysis and financialisation scholarships to uncover the role of planning and question the role of state actors in urban development processes. Through an analysis of CityLife in Milan and Tour and Taxis in Brussels, I argue that state actors have a strong agency in decision making as they own a critical resource: planning. My investigation reveals that, in projects characterised by uncertainty and internal conflicts, planning functions as a glue of development coalitions. Local governments mobilise it to bring together private and public interests, in order to achieve their agendas. Nevertheless, this glue function plays out differently in Milan and Brussels. While in Milan local administrations used planning to facilitate the anchoring of capital, in Brussels local governments enacted planning to shift the balance of power between them. This outcome reveals contextual differences that ultimately depend on local governance settings and planning systems. The comparison depicts the making of two different development regimes. CityLife indicates a financialised turn in governance, in which planning choices are driven mainly by economic – and financial – imperatives. Tour and Taxis symbolises an experimental entrepreneurial urban regime, a sort of "laboratory" to test new governance and planning frameworks.</span><br />
format article
author Veronica Conte
author_facet Veronica Conte
author_sort Veronica Conte
title Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
title_short Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
title_full Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
title_fullStr Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
title_full_unstemmed Planning: A Glue for Development Coalitions? State Actors' Agency and Power Relationships in Urban Development Projects in Milan and Brussels
title_sort planning: a glue for development coalitions? state actors' agency and power relationships in urban development projects in milan and brussels
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1da2035d21f74ef2a67e66049bed15d1
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicaconte planningagluefordevelopmentcoalitionsstateactorsagencyandpowerrelationshipsinurbandevelopmentprojectsinmilanandbrussels
_version_ 1718418689285423104