Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score
Abstract Although Ki67 labeling index is a potential predictive marker for chemotherapy benefit, its clinical utility has been limited by the lack of a standard scoring method resulting in poor interobserver reproducibility. Especially, there is no consensus on the use of average versus hotspot scor...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1da6a665e76f4556ac906f59f8900391 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1da6a665e76f4556ac906f59f8900391 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1da6a665e76f4556ac906f59f89003912021-12-02T13:30:14ZSystematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score10.1038/s41523-021-00221-z2374-4677https://doaj.org/article/1da6a665e76f4556ac906f59f89003912021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00221-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2374-4677Abstract Although Ki67 labeling index is a potential predictive marker for chemotherapy benefit, its clinical utility has been limited by the lack of a standard scoring method resulting in poor interobserver reproducibility. Especially, there is no consensus on the use of average versus hotspot score for reporting. In order to determine the best method for Ki67 scoring and validate manual scoring method proposed by the International Ki67 Working Group (IKWG), we systematically compared average versus hotspot score in 240 cases with a public domain image analysis program QuPath. We used OncotypeDx Recurrence Score (RS) as a benchmark to compare the potential clinical utility of each scoring methods. Both average and hotspot scores showed statistically significant but only modest correlation with OncotypeDx RS. Only hotspot score could meaningfully distinguish RS low-risk versus high-risk patients. However, hotspot score was less reproducible limiting its clinical utility. In summary, our data demonstrate that utility of the Ki67 labeling index is influenced by the choice of scoring method.Soonmyung PaikYoungmee KwonMoo Hyun LeeJi Ye KimDa Kyung LeeWon Jeong ChoEun Young LeeEun Sook LeeNature PortfolioarticleNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENnpj Breast Cancer, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 |
spellingShingle |
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 Soonmyung Paik Youngmee Kwon Moo Hyun Lee Ji Ye Kim Da Kyung Lee Won Jeong Cho Eun Young Lee Eun Sook Lee Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
description |
Abstract Although Ki67 labeling index is a potential predictive marker for chemotherapy benefit, its clinical utility has been limited by the lack of a standard scoring method resulting in poor interobserver reproducibility. Especially, there is no consensus on the use of average versus hotspot score for reporting. In order to determine the best method for Ki67 scoring and validate manual scoring method proposed by the International Ki67 Working Group (IKWG), we systematically compared average versus hotspot score in 240 cases with a public domain image analysis program QuPath. We used OncotypeDx Recurrence Score (RS) as a benchmark to compare the potential clinical utility of each scoring methods. Both average and hotspot scores showed statistically significant but only modest correlation with OncotypeDx RS. Only hotspot score could meaningfully distinguish RS low-risk versus high-risk patients. However, hotspot score was less reproducible limiting its clinical utility. In summary, our data demonstrate that utility of the Ki67 labeling index is influenced by the choice of scoring method. |
format |
article |
author |
Soonmyung Paik Youngmee Kwon Moo Hyun Lee Ji Ye Kim Da Kyung Lee Won Jeong Cho Eun Young Lee Eun Sook Lee |
author_facet |
Soonmyung Paik Youngmee Kwon Moo Hyun Lee Ji Ye Kim Da Kyung Lee Won Jeong Cho Eun Young Lee Eun Sook Lee |
author_sort |
Soonmyung Paik |
title |
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
title_short |
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
title_full |
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
title_fullStr |
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
title_sort |
systematic evaluation of scoring methods for ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1da6a665e76f4556ac906f59f8900391 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soonmyungpaik systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT youngmeekwon systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT moohyunlee systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT jiyekim systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT dakyunglee systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT wonjeongcho systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT eunyounglee systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore AT eunsooklee systematicevaluationofscoringmethodsforki67asasurrogatefor21generecurrencescore |
_version_ |
1718392901664243712 |