Growth theory after Keynes, part I: the unfortunate suppression of the Harrod-Domar model
After Harrod and Domar independently developed a dynamic Keynesian circular flow model to illustrate the instability of a growing economy, mainstream economists quickly reduced their model to a supply side-only growth model, which they subsequently rejected as too simplistic and replaced with Solow’...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Hendrik Van den Berg |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN FR |
Publicado: |
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1dcf178978514718abbde0ef34c2a6cc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
O modelo Harrod-Domar e a substitutibilidade de fatores
por: Luiz C. Bresser Pereira
Publicado: (1975) -
Growth theory after Keynes, part II: 75 years of obstruction by the mainstream economics culture
por: Hendrik Van den Berg
Publicado: (2014) -
A Bibliometric Study of Innovation Based on Schumpeter
por: Lazzarotti,Fábio, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Dos modelos post-keynesianos de crecimiento económico: Domar y Harrod
por: Paz, Pedro, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
“GENERAL THEORY” OF J.M. KEYNES: 80 YEARS AFTER
por: A. V. Kholopov
Publicado: (2016)