Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.

Determining the number of fish that use a fishway is essential to fisheries management but counting all fish can be impracticable due to labor and cost. We present the daily run-size estimation (DARSE) method, which uses systematic sampling to estimate the number of fish per species that pass throug...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariana O Côrtes, Alexandre Peressin, Alexandre L Godinho
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1defca909b5d4306b478a6d1e887f217
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1defca909b5d4306b478a6d1e887f217
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1defca909b5d4306b478a6d1e887f2172021-12-02T20:05:30ZLess effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252183https://doaj.org/article/1defca909b5d4306b478a6d1e887f2172021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252183https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Determining the number of fish that use a fishway is essential to fisheries management but counting all fish can be impracticable due to labor and cost. We present the daily run-size estimation (DARSE) method, which uses systematic sampling to estimate the number of fish per species that pass through a fishway daily (daily run size, D). The DARSE method makes it possible to determine the minimum fraction of each hour (or hourly samples) of the day necessary to estimate D with known accuracy. We apply DARSE to each of the seven most abundant fish species (other species grouped under 'Others') recorded in video images taken during 46 days of one year at the Igarapava Fish Ladder, Brazil. Accuracy in estimating D was influenced by the fraction of the hour sampled and the temporal pattern of fish passage through the fishway. For species with a more uniform temporal pattern of passage, the DARSE method reduced the time spent on sampling by up to 96%, depending on the accuracy used to estimate D. Some of these species required counts of fish that pass in a fraction of an hour for all hours of the day while counts for other species can be done every 2 hours or, more rarely, every 3 hours. For species with a more aggregated temporal pattern of passage, it was possible to estimate D by sampling a fraction of an hour but with reduced accuracy in the estimation of D and little reduction in sampling time.Mariana O CôrtesAlexandre PeressinAlexandre L GodinhoPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0252183 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mariana O Côrtes
Alexandre Peressin
Alexandre L Godinho
Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
description Determining the number of fish that use a fishway is essential to fisheries management but counting all fish can be impracticable due to labor and cost. We present the daily run-size estimation (DARSE) method, which uses systematic sampling to estimate the number of fish per species that pass through a fishway daily (daily run size, D). The DARSE method makes it possible to determine the minimum fraction of each hour (or hourly samples) of the day necessary to estimate D with known accuracy. We apply DARSE to each of the seven most abundant fish species (other species grouped under 'Others') recorded in video images taken during 46 days of one year at the Igarapava Fish Ladder, Brazil. Accuracy in estimating D was influenced by the fraction of the hour sampled and the temporal pattern of fish passage through the fishway. For species with a more uniform temporal pattern of passage, the DARSE method reduced the time spent on sampling by up to 96%, depending on the accuracy used to estimate D. Some of these species required counts of fish that pass in a fraction of an hour for all hours of the day while counts for other species can be done every 2 hours or, more rarely, every 3 hours. For species with a more aggregated temporal pattern of passage, it was possible to estimate D by sampling a fraction of an hour but with reduced accuracy in the estimation of D and little reduction in sampling time.
format article
author Mariana O Côrtes
Alexandre Peressin
Alexandre L Godinho
author_facet Mariana O Côrtes
Alexandre Peressin
Alexandre L Godinho
author_sort Mariana O Côrtes
title Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
title_short Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
title_full Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
title_fullStr Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
title_full_unstemmed Less effort but equal result: Introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
title_sort less effort but equal result: introducing the daily run-size estimation method for quantifying fish passage in fishways.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1defca909b5d4306b478a6d1e887f217
work_keys_str_mv AT marianaocortes lesseffortbutequalresultintroducingthedailyrunsizeestimationmethodforquantifyingfishpassageinfishways
AT alexandreperessin lesseffortbutequalresultintroducingthedailyrunsizeestimationmethodforquantifyingfishpassageinfishways
AT alexandrelgodinho lesseffortbutequalresultintroducingthedailyrunsizeestimationmethodforquantifyingfishpassageinfishways
_version_ 1718375468956123136