Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation

The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The asses...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertrand Teodosio, Francesco Bonacci, Seongwon Seo, Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge, Priyan Mendis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d2021-11-25T17:26:13ZMulti-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation10.3390/en142275151996-1073https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7515https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The assessment evaluates the structural performance, cost efficiency, and sustainability using finite element modelling, life cycle cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, respectively. The structural performance of the developed prefabricated system was found to have reduced the deformation and cracking by approximately 40%. However, the cost, GHG emission, and embodied energy were higher in the prefabricated footing system due to the greater required amount of concrete and steel than that of the waffle raft. The cost difference between the two systems can be reduced to as low as 6% when prefabricated systems were installed in a highly reactive sites with large floor areas. The life cycle assessment further observed that the prefabricated footing systems consume up to 21% more energy and up to 18% more GHG emissions. These can significantly be compensated by reusing the developed prefabricated footing system, decreasing the GHG emission and energy consumption by 75–77% and 55–59% with respect to that of the waffle raft.Bertrand TeodosioFrancesco BonacciSeongwon SeoKasun Shanaka Kristombu BadugePriyan MendisMDPI AGarticleprefabricated footing systemreactive soil foundationfinite element model (FEM)life cycle assessment (LCA)green house gases (GHG)life cycle cost (LCC)TechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7515, p 7515 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic prefabricated footing system
reactive soil foundation
finite element model (FEM)
life cycle assessment (LCA)
green house gases (GHG)
life cycle cost (LCC)
Technology
T
spellingShingle prefabricated footing system
reactive soil foundation
finite element model (FEM)
life cycle assessment (LCA)
green house gases (GHG)
life cycle cost (LCC)
Technology
T
Bertrand Teodosio
Francesco Bonacci
Seongwon Seo
Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge
Priyan Mendis
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
description The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The assessment evaluates the structural performance, cost efficiency, and sustainability using finite element modelling, life cycle cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, respectively. The structural performance of the developed prefabricated system was found to have reduced the deformation and cracking by approximately 40%. However, the cost, GHG emission, and embodied energy were higher in the prefabricated footing system due to the greater required amount of concrete and steel than that of the waffle raft. The cost difference between the two systems can be reduced to as low as 6% when prefabricated systems were installed in a highly reactive sites with large floor areas. The life cycle assessment further observed that the prefabricated footing systems consume up to 21% more energy and up to 18% more GHG emissions. These can significantly be compensated by reusing the developed prefabricated footing system, decreasing the GHG emission and energy consumption by 75–77% and 55–59% with respect to that of the waffle raft.
format article
author Bertrand Teodosio
Francesco Bonacci
Seongwon Seo
Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge
Priyan Mendis
author_facet Bertrand Teodosio
Francesco Bonacci
Seongwon Seo
Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge
Priyan Mendis
author_sort Bertrand Teodosio
title Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
title_short Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
title_full Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
title_fullStr Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
title_sort multi-criteria analysis of a developed prefabricated footing system on reactive soil foundation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d
work_keys_str_mv AT bertrandteodosio multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation
AT francescobonacci multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation
AT seongwonseo multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation
AT kasunshanakakristombubaduge multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation
AT priyanmendis multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation
_version_ 1718412335125626880