Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation
The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The asses...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d2021-11-25T17:26:13ZMulti-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation10.3390/en142275151996-1073https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7515https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The assessment evaluates the structural performance, cost efficiency, and sustainability using finite element modelling, life cycle cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, respectively. The structural performance of the developed prefabricated system was found to have reduced the deformation and cracking by approximately 40%. However, the cost, GHG emission, and embodied energy were higher in the prefabricated footing system due to the greater required amount of concrete and steel than that of the waffle raft. The cost difference between the two systems can be reduced to as low as 6% when prefabricated systems were installed in a highly reactive sites with large floor areas. The life cycle assessment further observed that the prefabricated footing systems consume up to 21% more energy and up to 18% more GHG emissions. These can significantly be compensated by reusing the developed prefabricated footing system, decreasing the GHG emission and energy consumption by 75–77% and 55–59% with respect to that of the waffle raft.Bertrand TeodosioFrancesco BonacciSeongwon SeoKasun Shanaka Kristombu BadugePriyan MendisMDPI AGarticleprefabricated footing systemreactive soil foundationfinite element model (FEM)life cycle assessment (LCA)green house gases (GHG)life cycle cost (LCC)TechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7515, p 7515 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
prefabricated footing system reactive soil foundation finite element model (FEM) life cycle assessment (LCA) green house gases (GHG) life cycle cost (LCC) Technology T |
spellingShingle |
prefabricated footing system reactive soil foundation finite element model (FEM) life cycle assessment (LCA) green house gases (GHG) life cycle cost (LCC) Technology T Bertrand Teodosio Francesco Bonacci Seongwon Seo Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge Priyan Mendis Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
description |
The need for advancements in residential construction and the hazard induced by the shrink–swell reactive soil movement prompted the development of the prefabricated footing system of this study, which was assessed and compared to a conventional waffle raft using a multi-criteria analysis. The assessment evaluates the structural performance, cost efficiency, and sustainability using finite element modelling, life cycle cost analysis, and life cycle assessment, respectively. The structural performance of the developed prefabricated system was found to have reduced the deformation and cracking by approximately 40%. However, the cost, GHG emission, and embodied energy were higher in the prefabricated footing system due to the greater required amount of concrete and steel than that of the waffle raft. The cost difference between the two systems can be reduced to as low as 6% when prefabricated systems were installed in a highly reactive sites with large floor areas. The life cycle assessment further observed that the prefabricated footing systems consume up to 21% more energy and up to 18% more GHG emissions. These can significantly be compensated by reusing the developed prefabricated footing system, decreasing the GHG emission and energy consumption by 75–77% and 55–59% with respect to that of the waffle raft. |
format |
article |
author |
Bertrand Teodosio Francesco Bonacci Seongwon Seo Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge Priyan Mendis |
author_facet |
Bertrand Teodosio Francesco Bonacci Seongwon Seo Kasun Shanaka Kristombu Baduge Priyan Mendis |
author_sort |
Bertrand Teodosio |
title |
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
title_short |
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
title_full |
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
title_fullStr |
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Developed Prefabricated Footing System on Reactive Soil Foundation |
title_sort |
multi-criteria analysis of a developed prefabricated footing system on reactive soil foundation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1df38b9724b3436596c0893f1b20937d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bertrandteodosio multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation AT francescobonacci multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation AT seongwonseo multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation AT kasunshanakakristombubaduge multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation AT priyanmendis multicriteriaanalysisofadevelopedprefabricatedfootingsystemonreactivesoilfoundation |
_version_ |
1718412335125626880 |