Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?

Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?

Bernard BinetruyINSERM U626, Faculté de Médecine La Timone, Marseille, FranceA current controversy in stem cell research was published on the BBC website recently. Some stem cell researchers have said that "they believe a small group of scientists is effect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bernard Binetruy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Cytology
QH573-671
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1df4f75404684fd991a45f3025fc9e29
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1df4f75404684fd991a45f3025fc9e29
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1df4f75404684fd991a45f3025fc9e292021-12-02T01:43:04ZAre reviewers obstructing stem cell research?1178-6957https://doaj.org/article/1df4f75404684fd991a45f3025fc9e292010-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/are-reviewers-obstructing-stem-cell-research-a5163https://doaj.org/toc/1178-6957Bernard BinetruyINSERM U626, Faculté de Médecine La Timone, Marseille, FranceA current controversy in stem cell research was published on the BBC website recently. Some stem cell researchers have said that "they believe a small group of scientists is effectively vetoing high quality science from publication in journals". They strongly suspected some reviewers to be deliberately sending back negative comments or asking for unnecessary experiments. Nature editor, Dr Philip Campbell, has said that "this idea is utterly false". Bernard BinetruyDove Medical PressarticleCytologyQH573-671ENStem Cells and Cloning: Advances and Applications, Vol 2010, Iss default, Pp 103-104 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cytology
QH573-671
spellingShingle Cytology
QH573-671
Bernard Binetruy
Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
description Bernard BinetruyINSERM U626, Faculté de Médecine La Timone, Marseille, FranceA current controversy in stem cell research was published on the BBC website recently. Some stem cell researchers have said that "they believe a small group of scientists is effectively vetoing high quality science from publication in journals". They strongly suspected some reviewers to be deliberately sending back negative comments or asking for unnecessary experiments. Nature editor, Dr Philip Campbell, has said that "this idea is utterly false".
format article
author Bernard Binetruy
author_facet Bernard Binetruy
author_sort Bernard Binetruy
title Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
title_short Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
title_full Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
title_fullStr Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
title_full_unstemmed Are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
title_sort are reviewers obstructing stem cell research?
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/1df4f75404684fd991a45f3025fc9e29
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardbinetruy arereviewersobstructingstemcellresearch
_version_ 1718402883169288192

Ejemplares similares