Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout

New multi-point methods, the six-point method of 3-2-1 sensor layout and the nine-point method of 3 × 3 sensor layout, have been proposed as the two-dimensional profilometry for a machined flat surface. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out and properties of proposed methods were examined. As a r...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryotaro Fujiwara, Hiroki Shimizu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1e15ccbb9873423cad03d07fe70dfca8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1e15ccbb9873423cad03d07fe70dfca8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1e15ccbb9873423cad03d07fe70dfca82021-11-26T04:40:06ZFeasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout2665-917410.1016/j.measen.2021.100358https://doaj.org/article/1e15ccbb9873423cad03d07fe70dfca82021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421003214https://doaj.org/toc/2665-9174New multi-point methods, the six-point method of 3-2-1 sensor layout and the nine-point method of 3 × 3 sensor layout, have been proposed as the two-dimensional profilometry for a machined flat surface. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out and properties of proposed methods were examined. As a result, it was shown that the six-point method, the minimum configuration that calculates the planar shape with only six displacement sensors, can obtain the equivalent result to that of the simple nine-point method. In the nine-point method with averaging, it was confirmed that the maximum and average values of the standard deviation of the reconstructed profile were reduced to 68% and 81%, respectively compared with simple nine-point method. The improved nine-point method that averages the pitching error to improve the data connection accuracy also proposed and this method reduced standard deviation, but effectiveness is limited.Ryotaro FujiwaraHiroki ShimizuElsevierarticleMulti-point methodProfile measurementSoftware datumOn-machine measurementFlatnessElectric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networksTK452-454.4ENMeasurement: Sensors, Vol 18, Iss , Pp 100358- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Multi-point method
Profile measurement
Software datum
On-machine measurement
Flatness
Electric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networks
TK452-454.4
spellingShingle Multi-point method
Profile measurement
Software datum
On-machine measurement
Flatness
Electric apparatus and materials. Electric circuits. Electric networks
TK452-454.4
Ryotaro Fujiwara
Hiroki Shimizu
Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
description New multi-point methods, the six-point method of 3-2-1 sensor layout and the nine-point method of 3 × 3 sensor layout, have been proposed as the two-dimensional profilometry for a machined flat surface. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out and properties of proposed methods were examined. As a result, it was shown that the six-point method, the minimum configuration that calculates the planar shape with only six displacement sensors, can obtain the equivalent result to that of the simple nine-point method. In the nine-point method with averaging, it was confirmed that the maximum and average values of the standard deviation of the reconstructed profile were reduced to 68% and 81%, respectively compared with simple nine-point method. The improved nine-point method that averages the pitching error to improve the data connection accuracy also proposed and this method reduced standard deviation, but effectiveness is limited.
format article
author Ryotaro Fujiwara
Hiroki Shimizu
author_facet Ryotaro Fujiwara
Hiroki Shimizu
author_sort Ryotaro Fujiwara
title Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
title_short Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
title_full Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
title_fullStr Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
title_sort feasibility study of multi-point two-dimensional profile measurement by 3-2-1 and 3×3 sensor layout
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1e15ccbb9873423cad03d07fe70dfca8
work_keys_str_mv AT ryotarofujiwara feasibilitystudyofmultipointtwodimensionalprofilemeasurementby321and33sensorlayout
AT hirokishimizu feasibilitystudyofmultipointtwodimensionalprofilemeasurementby321and33sensorlayout
_version_ 1718409826682273792