Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis

The pervasiveness of the Internet has raised concern about its (problematic) use and the potentially negative impact on people's health. Neuroticism has been identified as one potential risk factor of Internet and other online addictions. To obtain a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laura Marciano, Anne-Linda Camerini, Peter J. Schulz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1e3607735efb4570812f6c5a94620630
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1e3607735efb4570812f6c5a94620630
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1e3607735efb4570812f6c5a946206302021-12-01T05:03:21ZNeuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2020.100026https://doaj.org/article/1e3607735efb4570812f6c5a946206302020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958820300269https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588The pervasiveness of the Internet has raised concern about its (problematic) use and the potentially negative impact on people's health. Neuroticism has been identified as one potential risk factor of Internet and other online addictions. To obtain a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of the association of neuroticism and both overall and problematic Internet activities, a meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was carried out in nine academic databases. After a stepwise screening procedure, 159 studies were eventually included: 104 studies in the meta-analysis on neuroticism and Internet activities and 64 studies in the meta-analysis on neuroticism and problematic Internet activities, comprising Internet, social media, Facebook, smartphone, and online gaming addiction (9 studies considered both aspects). When it comes to overall Internet activities, effect sizes were generally small and frequently non-significant, with some exceptions (e.g., expression of real me). For problematic Internet activities, a completely different picture emerged: high levels of neuroticism significantly correlated with all measures of problematic Internet activities, with medium size correlations. The differential results for Internet activities in general and problematic Internet activities can be related to problems in the conceptualization and assessment of the latter. More research is needed to overcome current conceptual and methodological issues and investigate the real nature of problematic Internet activities and to be eventually able to evaluate if neurotic people are really an at-risk population.Laura MarcianoAnne-Linda CameriniPeter J. SchulzElsevierarticleInternet activitiesProblematic internet activitiesPersonalityNeuroticismMeta-analysisInternet addictionElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100026- (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Internet activities
Problematic internet activities
Personality
Neuroticism
Meta-analysis
Internet addiction
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Internet activities
Problematic internet activities
Personality
Neuroticism
Meta-analysis
Internet addiction
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
Laura Marciano
Anne-Linda Camerini
Peter J. Schulz
Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
description The pervasiveness of the Internet has raised concern about its (problematic) use and the potentially negative impact on people's health. Neuroticism has been identified as one potential risk factor of Internet and other online addictions. To obtain a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of the association of neuroticism and both overall and problematic Internet activities, a meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was carried out in nine academic databases. After a stepwise screening procedure, 159 studies were eventually included: 104 studies in the meta-analysis on neuroticism and Internet activities and 64 studies in the meta-analysis on neuroticism and problematic Internet activities, comprising Internet, social media, Facebook, smartphone, and online gaming addiction (9 studies considered both aspects). When it comes to overall Internet activities, effect sizes were generally small and frequently non-significant, with some exceptions (e.g., expression of real me). For problematic Internet activities, a completely different picture emerged: high levels of neuroticism significantly correlated with all measures of problematic Internet activities, with medium size correlations. The differential results for Internet activities in general and problematic Internet activities can be related to problems in the conceptualization and assessment of the latter. More research is needed to overcome current conceptual and methodological issues and investigate the real nature of problematic Internet activities and to be eventually able to evaluate if neurotic people are really an at-risk population.
format article
author Laura Marciano
Anne-Linda Camerini
Peter J. Schulz
author_facet Laura Marciano
Anne-Linda Camerini
Peter J. Schulz
author_sort Laura Marciano
title Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
title_short Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
title_full Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis
title_sort neuroticism in the digital age: a meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/1e3607735efb4570812f6c5a94620630
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramarciano neuroticisminthedigitalageametaanalysis
AT annelindacamerini neuroticisminthedigitalageametaanalysis
AT peterjschulz neuroticisminthedigitalageametaanalysis
_version_ 1718405527759749120