Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Abstract The development of alternative isothermal amplification assays including multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) may address speed and portability limitations of real-time PCR (rt-PCR) methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. We developed a novel SARS-CoV-2 MCDA assay and compared its spe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Laurence Don Wai Luu, Michael Payne, Xiaomei Zhang, Lijuan Luo, Ruiting Lan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1e66bb47ce494dafa69487359904b886
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1e66bb47ce494dafa69487359904b886
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1e66bb47ce494dafa69487359904b8862021-12-02T13:48:53ZDevelopment and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection10.1038/s41598-021-81518-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1e66bb47ce494dafa69487359904b8862021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81518-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The development of alternative isothermal amplification assays including multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) may address speed and portability limitations of real-time PCR (rt-PCR) methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. We developed a novel SARS-CoV-2 MCDA assay and compared its speed and sensitivity to loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and rt-PCR. Two MCDA assays targeting SARS-CoV-2 N gene and ORF1ab were designed. The fastest time to detection and sensitivity of MCDA was compared to LAMP and rt-PCR using DNA standards and transcribed RNA. For the N gene, MCDA was faster than LAMP and rt-PCR by 10 and 20 min, respectively with fastest time to detection at 5.2 min. rt-PCR had the highest sensitivity with the limit of detection at 10 copies/µl compared with MCDA (100 copies/µl) and LAMP (500 copies/µl). For ORF1ab, MCDA and LAMP had similar speed with fastest time to detection at 9.7 and 8.4 min, respectively. LAMP was more sensitive for ORF1ab detection with 50 copies/µl compared to MCDA (500 copies/µl). In conclusion, different nucleic acid amplification methods provide different advantages. MCDA is the fastest nucleic acid amplification method for SARS-CoV-2 while rt-PCR is the most sensitive. These advantages should be considered when determining the most suitable nucleic acid amplification methods for different applications.Laurence Don Wai LuuMichael PayneXiaomei ZhangLijuan LuoRuiting LanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Laurence Don Wai Luu Michael Payne Xiaomei Zhang Lijuan Luo Ruiting Lan Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
description	Abstract The development of alternative isothermal amplification assays including multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) may address speed and portability limitations of real-time PCR (rt-PCR) methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. We developed a novel SARS-CoV-2 MCDA assay and compared its speed and sensitivity to loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and rt-PCR. Two MCDA assays targeting SARS-CoV-2 N gene and ORF1ab were designed. The fastest time to detection and sensitivity of MCDA was compared to LAMP and rt-PCR using DNA standards and transcribed RNA. For the N gene, MCDA was faster than LAMP and rt-PCR by 10 and 20 min, respectively with fastest time to detection at 5.2 min. rt-PCR had the highest sensitivity with the limit of detection at 10 copies/µl compared with MCDA (100 copies/µl) and LAMP (500 copies/µl). For ORF1ab, MCDA and LAMP had similar speed with fastest time to detection at 9.7 and 8.4 min, respectively. LAMP was more sensitive for ORF1ab detection with 50 copies/µl compared to MCDA (500 copies/µl). In conclusion, different nucleic acid amplification methods provide different advantages. MCDA is the fastest nucleic acid amplification method for SARS-CoV-2 while rt-PCR is the most sensitive. These advantages should be considered when determining the most suitable nucleic acid amplification methods for different applications.
format	article
author	Laurence Don Wai Luu Michael Payne Xiaomei Zhang Lijuan Luo Ruiting Lan
author_facet	Laurence Don Wai Luu Michael Payne Xiaomei Zhang Lijuan Luo Ruiting Lan
author_sort	Laurence Don Wai Luu
title	Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
title_short	Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
title_full	Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
title_fullStr	Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
title_full_unstemmed	Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection
title_sort	development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (mcda) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for sars-cov-2 detection
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1e66bb47ce494dafa69487359904b886
work_keys_str_mv	AT laurencedonwailuu developmentandcomparisonofnovelmultiplecrossdisplacementamplificationmcdaassayswithothernucleicacidamplificationmethodsforsarscov2detection AT michaelpayne developmentandcomparisonofnovelmultiplecrossdisplacementamplificationmcdaassayswithothernucleicacidamplificationmethodsforsarscov2detection AT xiaomeizhang developmentandcomparisonofnovelmultiplecrossdisplacementamplificationmcdaassayswithothernucleicacidamplificationmethodsforsarscov2detection AT lijuanluo developmentandcomparisonofnovelmultiplecrossdisplacementamplificationmcdaassayswithothernucleicacidamplificationmethodsforsarscov2detection AT ruitinglan developmentandcomparisonofnovelmultiplecrossdisplacementamplificationmcdaassayswithothernucleicacidamplificationmethodsforsarscov2detection
_version_	1718392425348595712

Development and comparison of novel multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assays with other nucleic acid amplification methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Ejemplares similares