Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition
Sociologists have generally treated the reports of the Marian apparitions at the Bosnian village of Medjugorje (starting in 1981) as religious phenomena. The later eruption of war in that region, on the other hand, was cast as an ethnic conflict – albeit one that split on supposedly religious lines....
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | AR EN TR |
| Publicado: |
Ibn Haldun University
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1e847be6a2f543b983f91a21cd9827cb |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1e847be6a2f543b983f91a21cd9827cb |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1e847be6a2f543b983f91a21cd9827cb2021-11-18T17:44:51ZUnderstanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition10.36657/ihcd.2016.132651-379Xhttps://doaj.org/article/1e847be6a2f543b983f91a21cd9827cb2016-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.ihu.edu.tr/index.php/ihu1/article/view/27https://doaj.org/toc/2651-379XSociologists have generally treated the reports of the Marian apparitions at the Bosnian village of Medjugorje (starting in 1981) as religious phenomena. The later eruption of war in that region, on the other hand, was cast as an ethnic conflict – albeit one that split on supposedly religious lines. This discursive divide stems from the standard sociological treatment of ‘religion’ and ‘ethnicity’ as being fundamentally different sorts of things. In the standard view, “religion” has to do with beliefs and organizations, while ‘ethnicity’ is a matter of tribal, ultimately biological, heritage. Unlike Western sociologists, Ibn Khaldûn famously applied the same conceptual resources to religion and to ethnicity, seeing them both as potential sources of “groupfeeling”. Both could sustain group identities in the face of conflict and change, and in the same way. This article evaluates the Khaldûnian approach by placing “the miracles at Medjugorje” in the context of southwestern Bosnia’s locally constituted ‘ethnic’ identities. It tracks the complex ways in which both religion and ethnicity were used to heighten group divisions. It ultimately concludes, however, that the Khaldûnian approach does not adequately capture the dynamics of either the ‘miracles’ or of the instrumentalism that drove the Bosnian conflict.James V. SpickardIbn Haldun UniversityarticleGroup-FeelingBosniaMarian ApparitionsWarEthnic ConflictSocial SciencesHLanguage and LiteraturePArts in generalNX1-820ARENTRİbn Haldun Çalışmaları Dergisi, Vol 1, Iss 2 (2016) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
AR EN TR |
| topic |
Group-Feeling Bosnia Marian Apparitions War Ethnic Conflict Social Sciences H Language and Literature P Arts in general NX1-820 |
| spellingShingle |
Group-Feeling Bosnia Marian Apparitions War Ethnic Conflict Social Sciences H Language and Literature P Arts in general NX1-820 James V. Spickard Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| description |
Sociologists have generally treated the reports of the Marian apparitions at the Bosnian village of Medjugorje (starting in 1981) as religious phenomena. The later eruption of war in that region, on the other hand, was cast as an ethnic conflict – albeit one that split on supposedly religious lines. This discursive divide stems from the standard sociological treatment of ‘religion’ and ‘ethnicity’ as being fundamentally different sorts of things. In the standard view, “religion” has to do with beliefs and organizations, while ‘ethnicity’ is a matter of tribal, ultimately biological, heritage. Unlike Western sociologists, Ibn Khaldûn famously applied the same conceptual resources to religion and to ethnicity, seeing them both as potential sources of “groupfeeling”. Both could sustain group identities in the face of conflict and change, and in the same way. This article evaluates the Khaldûnian approach by placing “the miracles at Medjugorje” in the context of southwestern Bosnia’s locally constituted ‘ethnic’ identities. It tracks the complex ways in which both religion and ethnicity were used to heighten group divisions. It ultimately concludes, however, that the Khaldûnian approach does not adequately capture the dynamics of either the ‘miracles’ or of the instrumentalism that drove the Bosnian conflict. |
| format |
article |
| author |
James V. Spickard |
| author_facet |
James V. Spickard |
| author_sort |
James V. Spickard |
| title |
Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| title_short |
Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| title_full |
Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| title_fullStr |
Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding Medjugorje: A Khaldunian Approach to a Marian Apparition |
| title_sort |
understanding medjugorje: a khaldunian approach to a marian apparition |
| publisher |
Ibn Haldun University |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/1e847be6a2f543b983f91a21cd9827cb |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamesvspickard understandingmedjugorjeakhaldunianapproachtoamarianapparition |
| _version_ |
1718420712670101504 |