Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
Abstract Background Missing outcome data can lead to bias in the results of systematic reviews. One way to address missing outcome data is by requesting the data from the trial authors, but non-response is common. One way to potentially improve response rates is by sending study participants advance...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Benjamin Woolf, Phil Edwards |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1eaefbd686274e2ca715ae433c49dfb7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Benjamin Woolf, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Home-based Extended Rehabilitation for Older people (HERO): study protocol for an individually randomised controlled multi-centre trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based exercise intervention for older people with frailty as extended rehabilitation following acute illness or injury, including embedded process evaluation
por: Matthew Prescott, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of digital adherence technology with differentiated care to support tuberculosis treatment adherence and improve treatment outcomes in Ethiopia: a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial
por: Amare W. Tadesse, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
APOS—antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing infectious complications in orthognathic surgery: study protocol for a phase III, multicentre, randomised, controlled, double blinded, clinical trial with two parallel study arms
por: Oliver Ristow, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cranberry juice concentrate does not significantly decrease the incidence of acquired bacteriuria in female hip fracture patients receiving urine catheter: a double-blind randomized trial
por: Gunnarsson AK, et al.
Publicado: (2017)