Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California

Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adam R. Hanbury-Brown, Jeffery W. Stackhouse, Luke T. Macaulay
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e96222021-12-02T14:37:54ZElk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California1708-308710.5751/ES-12283-260123https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e96222021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss1/art23/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are estimated to have doubled in the past 35 years, marking a conservation success, but also increasing forage loss and damage to infrastructure on private land. Wildlife managers are pursuing the goal of increasing elk numbers on public lands, but elk are preferentially utilizing private pasture and rangeland, driving conflict with beef and dairy producers. We conducted 17 semistructured interviews with private landowners, primarily beef and dairy producers, in northern California to understand their experiences and reactions to elk conflict and state wildlife management. Landowners report that elk density on private rangeland has steadily increased in recent years and poses a threat to their businesses due to loss of forage, damage to fences, and the corresponding liability risk posed by breached fences and errant cattle. The absence of crop and forage loss compensation, difficulty obtaining depredation permits, and low harvest quotas for recreational hunting limit landowner mitigation options and foster resentment toward the state wildlife agency. Most landowners believe that current elk management policies, including restricted hunting opportunities, do not adequately address elk conflict, creating novel challenges for wildlife officials tasked with reconciling elk restoration goals with a variety of stakeholders experiencing economic losses and threats to rural livelihoods. We discuss these issues in the context of common wildlife management challenges, such as building social capital, defining tolerable impacts, and building institutional capacity for alternative solutions within rigid regulatory frameworks. We draw upon environmental economics and common-pool resource theory to suggest that a rethinking of elk management based on local conditions, facilitating damage compensation mechanisms while reducing transaction costs, and increasing participation of local stakeholders in decision making might improve outcomes.Adam R. Hanbury-BrownJeffery W. StackhouseLuke T. MacaulayResilience Alliancearticleelk conflicthuntingnorthern californiapasture depredationprivate landrangelandwildlife conflictwildlife managementBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1, p 23 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic elk conflict
hunting
northern california
pasture depredation
private land
rangeland
wildlife conflict
wildlife management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle elk conflict
hunting
northern california
pasture depredation
private land
rangeland
wildlife conflict
wildlife management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
description Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are estimated to have doubled in the past 35 years, marking a conservation success, but also increasing forage loss and damage to infrastructure on private land. Wildlife managers are pursuing the goal of increasing elk numbers on public lands, but elk are preferentially utilizing private pasture and rangeland, driving conflict with beef and dairy producers. We conducted 17 semistructured interviews with private landowners, primarily beef and dairy producers, in northern California to understand their experiences and reactions to elk conflict and state wildlife management. Landowners report that elk density on private rangeland has steadily increased in recent years and poses a threat to their businesses due to loss of forage, damage to fences, and the corresponding liability risk posed by breached fences and errant cattle. The absence of crop and forage loss compensation, difficulty obtaining depredation permits, and low harvest quotas for recreational hunting limit landowner mitigation options and foster resentment toward the state wildlife agency. Most landowners believe that current elk management policies, including restricted hunting opportunities, do not adequately address elk conflict, creating novel challenges for wildlife officials tasked with reconciling elk restoration goals with a variety of stakeholders experiencing economic losses and threats to rural livelihoods. We discuss these issues in the context of common wildlife management challenges, such as building social capital, defining tolerable impacts, and building institutional capacity for alternative solutions within rigid regulatory frameworks. We draw upon environmental economics and common-pool resource theory to suggest that a rethinking of elk management based on local conditions, facilitating damage compensation mechanisms while reducing transaction costs, and increasing participation of local stakeholders in decision making might improve outcomes.
format article
author Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
author_facet Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
author_sort Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
title Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_short Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_full Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_fullStr Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_full_unstemmed Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_sort elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern california
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
work_keys_str_mv AT adamrhanburybrown elkconflictwithbeefanddairyproducersposeswildlifemanagementchallengesinnortherncalifornia
AT jefferywstackhouse elkconflictwithbeefanddairyproducersposeswildlifemanagementchallengesinnortherncalifornia
AT luketmacaulay elkconflictwithbeefanddairyproducersposeswildlifemanagementchallengesinnortherncalifornia
_version_ 1718390938464681984