Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the p...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d2021-12-02T17:32:59ZIndividual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention10.1038/s41598-021-87717-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87717-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the present study, we investigated the flexibility between independent and collective modes of behavior in a simulated social foraging task designed to benefit from both modes: distancing among ten foraging agents promoted faster detection of resources, whereas flocking promoted faster consumption. There was a tradeoff between faster detection versus faster consumption, but both factors contributed to foraging success. Results showed that group foraging performance among simulated agents was enhanced by loose coupling that balanced distancing and flocking among agents and enabled them to fluidly switch among a variety of groupings. We also examined the effects of more sophisticated cognitive capacities by studying how human players improve performance when they control one of the search agents. Results showed that human intervention further enhanced group performance with loosely coupled agents, and human foragers performed better when coordinating with loosely coupled agents. Humans players adapted their balance of independent versus collective search modes in response to the dynamics of simulated agents, thereby demonstrating the importance of adaptive flexibility in social foraging.Daniel S. SchloesserDerek HollenbeckChristopher T. KelloNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Daniel S. Schloesser Derek Hollenbeck Christopher T. Kello Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
description |
Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the present study, we investigated the flexibility between independent and collective modes of behavior in a simulated social foraging task designed to benefit from both modes: distancing among ten foraging agents promoted faster detection of resources, whereas flocking promoted faster consumption. There was a tradeoff between faster detection versus faster consumption, but both factors contributed to foraging success. Results showed that group foraging performance among simulated agents was enhanced by loose coupling that balanced distancing and flocking among agents and enabled them to fluidly switch among a variety of groupings. We also examined the effects of more sophisticated cognitive capacities by studying how human players improve performance when they control one of the search agents. Results showed that human intervention further enhanced group performance with loosely coupled agents, and human foragers performed better when coordinating with loosely coupled agents. Humans players adapted their balance of independent versus collective search modes in response to the dynamics of simulated agents, thereby demonstrating the importance of adaptive flexibility in social foraging. |
format |
article |
author |
Daniel S. Schloesser Derek Hollenbeck Christopher T. Kello |
author_facet |
Daniel S. Schloesser Derek Hollenbeck Christopher T. Kello |
author_sort |
Daniel S. Schloesser |
title |
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
title_short |
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
title_full |
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
title_fullStr |
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
title_sort |
individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielsschloesser individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention AT derekhollenbeck individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention AT christophertkello individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention |
_version_ |
1718380108054528000 |