Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention

Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel S. Schloesser, Derek Hollenbeck, Christopher T. Kello
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d2021-12-02T17:32:59ZIndividual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention10.1038/s41598-021-87717-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87717-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the present study, we investigated the flexibility between independent and collective modes of behavior in a simulated social foraging task designed to benefit from both modes: distancing among ten foraging agents promoted faster detection of resources, whereas flocking promoted faster consumption. There was a tradeoff between faster detection versus faster consumption, but both factors contributed to foraging success. Results showed that group foraging performance among simulated agents was enhanced by loose coupling that balanced distancing and flocking among agents and enabled them to fluidly switch among a variety of groupings. We also examined the effects of more sophisticated cognitive capacities by studying how human players improve performance when they control one of the search agents. Results showed that human intervention further enhanced group performance with loosely coupled agents, and human foragers performed better when coordinating with loosely coupled agents. Humans players adapted their balance of independent versus collective search modes in response to the dynamics of simulated agents, thereby demonstrating the importance of adaptive flexibility in social foraging.Daniel S. SchloesserDerek HollenbeckChristopher T. KelloNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Daniel S. Schloesser
Derek Hollenbeck
Christopher T. Kello
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
description Abstract Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the present study, we investigated the flexibility between independent and collective modes of behavior in a simulated social foraging task designed to benefit from both modes: distancing among ten foraging agents promoted faster detection of resources, whereas flocking promoted faster consumption. There was a tradeoff between faster detection versus faster consumption, but both factors contributed to foraging success. Results showed that group foraging performance among simulated agents was enhanced by loose coupling that balanced distancing and flocking among agents and enabled them to fluidly switch among a variety of groupings. We also examined the effects of more sophisticated cognitive capacities by studying how human players improve performance when they control one of the search agents. Results showed that human intervention further enhanced group performance with loosely coupled agents, and human foragers performed better when coordinating with loosely coupled agents. Humans players adapted their balance of independent versus collective search modes in response to the dynamics of simulated agents, thereby demonstrating the importance of adaptive flexibility in social foraging.
format article
author Daniel S. Schloesser
Derek Hollenbeck
Christopher T. Kello
author_facet Daniel S. Schloesser
Derek Hollenbeck
Christopher T. Kello
author_sort Daniel S. Schloesser
title Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
title_short Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
title_full Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
title_fullStr Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
title_full_unstemmed Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
title_sort individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1f5a6eeda3b54dde9fe3fb1ae3d7e61d
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsschloesser individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention
AT derekhollenbeck individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention
AT christophertkello individualandcollectiveforaginginautonomoussearchagentswithhumanintervention
_version_ 1718380108054528000