Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: As cities densify, researcher and policy focus is intensifying on which green space types and qualities are important for health. We conducted a systematic review to examine whether particular green space types and qualities have been shown to provide health benefits and if so, which...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phi-Yen Nguyen, Thomas Astell-Burt, Hania Rahimi-Ardabili, Xiaoqi Feng
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1f72878f74f348c38de81193d54f264d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1f72878f74f348c38de81193d54f264d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1f72878f74f348c38de81193d54f264d2021-11-11T16:11:06ZGreen Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review10.3390/ijerph1821110281660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/1f72878f74f348c38de81193d54f264d2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11028https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601(1) Background: As cities densify, researcher and policy focus is intensifying on which green space types and qualities are important for health. We conducted a systematic review to examine whether particular green space types and qualities have been shown to provide health benefits and if so, which specific types and qualities, and which health outcomes. (2) Methods: We searched five databases from inception up to June 30, 2021. We included all studies examining a wide range of green space characteristics on various health outcomes. (3) Results: 68 articles from 59 studies were found, with a high degree of heterogeneity in study designs, definitions of quality and outcomes. Most studies were cross-sectional, ecological or cohort studies. Environment types, vegetation types, and the size and connectivity of green spaces were associated with improved health outcomes, though with contingencies by age and gender. Health benefits were more consistently observed in areas with greater tree canopy, but not grassland. The main outcomes with evidence of health benefits included allergic respiratory conditions, cardiovascular conditions and psychological wellbeing. Both objectively and subjectively measured qualities demonstrated associations with health outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Experimental studies and longitudinal cohort studies will strengthen current evidence. Evidence was lacking for needs-specific or culturally-appropriate amenities and soundscape characteristics. Qualities that need more in-depth investigation include indices that account for forms, patterns, and networks of objectively and subjectively measured green space qualities.Phi-Yen NguyenThomas Astell-BurtHania Rahimi-ArdabiliXiaoqi FengMDPI AGarticlegreen space qualitiesparksstreetscape greeneryenvironmental typesbuilt environmentphysical healthMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11028, p 11028 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic green space qualities
parks
streetscape greenery
environmental types
built environment
physical health
Medicine
R
spellingShingle green space qualities
parks
streetscape greenery
environmental types
built environment
physical health
Medicine
R
Phi-Yen Nguyen
Thomas Astell-Burt
Hania Rahimi-Ardabili
Xiaoqi Feng
Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
description (1) Background: As cities densify, researcher and policy focus is intensifying on which green space types and qualities are important for health. We conducted a systematic review to examine whether particular green space types and qualities have been shown to provide health benefits and if so, which specific types and qualities, and which health outcomes. (2) Methods: We searched five databases from inception up to June 30, 2021. We included all studies examining a wide range of green space characteristics on various health outcomes. (3) Results: 68 articles from 59 studies were found, with a high degree of heterogeneity in study designs, definitions of quality and outcomes. Most studies were cross-sectional, ecological or cohort studies. Environment types, vegetation types, and the size and connectivity of green spaces were associated with improved health outcomes, though with contingencies by age and gender. Health benefits were more consistently observed in areas with greater tree canopy, but not grassland. The main outcomes with evidence of health benefits included allergic respiratory conditions, cardiovascular conditions and psychological wellbeing. Both objectively and subjectively measured qualities demonstrated associations with health outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Experimental studies and longitudinal cohort studies will strengthen current evidence. Evidence was lacking for needs-specific or culturally-appropriate amenities and soundscape characteristics. Qualities that need more in-depth investigation include indices that account for forms, patterns, and networks of objectively and subjectively measured green space qualities.
format article
author Phi-Yen Nguyen
Thomas Astell-Burt
Hania Rahimi-Ardabili
Xiaoqi Feng
author_facet Phi-Yen Nguyen
Thomas Astell-Burt
Hania Rahimi-Ardabili
Xiaoqi Feng
author_sort Phi-Yen Nguyen
title Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
title_short Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
title_full Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review
title_sort green space quality and health: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1f72878f74f348c38de81193d54f264d
work_keys_str_mv AT phiyennguyen greenspacequalityandhealthasystematicreview
AT thomasastellburt greenspacequalityandhealthasystematicreview
AT haniarahimiardabili greenspacequalityandhealthasystematicreview
AT xiaoqifeng greenspacequalityandhealthasystematicreview
_version_ 1718432341581365248