Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements

Jason J Howard1,2 1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sidra Medical and Research Center, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar Abstract: Due to problems with wear particle generation and subsequent loosening using conventional metal-on-poly...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Howard JJ
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1f9c3f6732da49a48b3dfff02b464033
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1f9c3f6732da49a48b3dfff02b464033
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1f9c3f6732da49a48b3dfff02b4640332021-12-02T06:34:19ZBalancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/1f9c3f6732da49a48b3dfff02b4640332016-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/balancing-innovation-and-medical-device-regulation-the-case-of-modern--peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Jason J Howard1,2 1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sidra Medical and Research Center, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar Abstract: Due to problems with wear particle generation and subsequent loosening using conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacements, there has been a shift toward alternative bearing systems, including metal-on-metal (MoM), for younger, more active patients with degenerative joint disease. Based on positive results from early short-term clinical studies, MoM hip replacements were readily adopted by orthopedic surgeons with thousands being implanted worldwide over the past decade. Unacceptably high revision rates reported by two national joint registries called into question the rigorousness of the regulatory approval process for these implants, particularly with respect to premarket data requirements to prove safety, effectiveness, and the appropriateness of the regulatory pathway chosen. The purpose of this review was to investigate the balance between facilitating the introduction of new medical technologies and the need to ensure safety and effectiveness through comprehensive regulatory assessment. The case of MoM hip replacement devices was used to frame the investigation and subsequent discussions. The regulatory approval processes and post-market surveillance requirements associated with three common MoM hip replacements (two resurfacings: the Birmingham and articular surface replacement and the articular surface replacement XL total hip replacement) were investigated. With respect to modern MoM hip replacement devices, the balance between facilitating the introduction of these new medical technologies and the need to ensure safety and effectiveness through comprehensive regulatory assessment was not achieved. The lessons learned from these experiences have application beyond joint replacements to the introduction of new medical technologies in general, particularly for those who have a significant potential for harm. In this regard, a series of recommendations have been developed to contribute to the evolution of the medical device regulatory process. Keywords: medical devices, regulation, safety and effectiveness, metal-on-metal hip replacementHoward JJDove Medical Pressarticlemedical devicesregulationsafety and effectivenessmetal-on-metal hip replacementMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 267-275 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic medical devices
regulation
safety and effectiveness
metal-on-metal hip replacement
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle medical devices
regulation
safety and effectiveness
metal-on-metal hip replacement
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Howard JJ
Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
description Jason J Howard1,2 1Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sidra Medical and Research Center, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar Abstract: Due to problems with wear particle generation and subsequent loosening using conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacements, there has been a shift toward alternative bearing systems, including metal-on-metal (MoM), for younger, more active patients with degenerative joint disease. Based on positive results from early short-term clinical studies, MoM hip replacements were readily adopted by orthopedic surgeons with thousands being implanted worldwide over the past decade. Unacceptably high revision rates reported by two national joint registries called into question the rigorousness of the regulatory approval process for these implants, particularly with respect to premarket data requirements to prove safety, effectiveness, and the appropriateness of the regulatory pathway chosen. The purpose of this review was to investigate the balance between facilitating the introduction of new medical technologies and the need to ensure safety and effectiveness through comprehensive regulatory assessment. The case of MoM hip replacement devices was used to frame the investigation and subsequent discussions. The regulatory approval processes and post-market surveillance requirements associated with three common MoM hip replacements (two resurfacings: the Birmingham and articular surface replacement and the articular surface replacement XL total hip replacement) were investigated. With respect to modern MoM hip replacement devices, the balance between facilitating the introduction of these new medical technologies and the need to ensure safety and effectiveness through comprehensive regulatory assessment was not achieved. The lessons learned from these experiences have application beyond joint replacements to the introduction of new medical technologies in general, particularly for those who have a significant potential for harm. In this regard, a series of recommendations have been developed to contribute to the evolution of the medical device regulatory process. Keywords: medical devices, regulation, safety and effectiveness, metal-on-metal hip replacement
format article
author Howard JJ
author_facet Howard JJ
author_sort Howard JJ
title Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
title_short Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
title_full Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
title_fullStr Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
title_full_unstemmed Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
title_sort balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/1f9c3f6732da49a48b3dfff02b464033
work_keys_str_mv AT howardjj balancinginnovationandmedicaldeviceregulationthecaseofmodernmetalonmetalhipreplacements
_version_ 1718399797648424960