Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control

New Zealand responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a combination of border restrictions and an Alert Level (AL) system that included strict stay-at-home orders. These interventions were successful in containing an outbreak and ultimately eliminating community transmission of COVID-19 in June 2020....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachelle N. Binny, Michael G. Baker, Shaun C. Hendy, Alex James, Audrey Lustig, Michael J. Plank, Kannan M. Ridings, Nicholas Steyn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1ffdcdd6686045cebacc4de89e4f23df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1ffdcdd6686045cebacc4de89e4f23df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1ffdcdd6686045cebacc4de89e4f23df2021-11-17T08:05:51ZEarly intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control10.1098/rsos.2104882054-5703https://doaj.org/article/1ffdcdd6686045cebacc4de89e4f23df2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.210488https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703New Zealand responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a combination of border restrictions and an Alert Level (AL) system that included strict stay-at-home orders. These interventions were successful in containing an outbreak and ultimately eliminating community transmission of COVID-19 in June 2020. The timing of interventions is crucial to their success. Delaying interventions may reduce their effectiveness and mean that they need to be maintained for a longer period. We use a stochastic branching process model of COVID-19 transmission and control to simulate the epidemic trajectory in New Zealand's March–April 2020 outbreak and the effect of its interventions. We calculate key measures, including the number of reported cases and deaths, and the probability of elimination within a specified time frame. By comparing these measures under alternative timings of interventions, we show that changing the timing of AL4 (the strictest level of restrictions) has a far greater impact than the timing of border measures. Delaying AL4 restrictions results in considerably worse outcomes. Implementing border measures alone, without AL4 restrictions, is insufficient to control the outbreak. We conclude that the early introduction of stay-at-home orders was crucial in reducing the number of cases and deaths, enabling elimination.Rachelle N. BinnyMichael G. BakerShaun C. HendyAlex JamesAudrey LustigMichael J. PlankKannan M. RidingsNicholas SteynThe Royal Societyarticleinfectious disease outbreaknon-pharmaceutical interventionsstochastic modelCOVID-19coronavirusborder restrictionsScienceQENRoyal Society Open Science, Vol 8, Iss 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic infectious disease outbreak
non-pharmaceutical interventions
stochastic model
COVID-19
coronavirus
border restrictions
Science
Q
spellingShingle infectious disease outbreak
non-pharmaceutical interventions
stochastic model
COVID-19
coronavirus
border restrictions
Science
Q
Rachelle N. Binny
Michael G. Baker
Shaun C. Hendy
Alex James
Audrey Lustig
Michael J. Plank
Kannan M. Ridings
Nicholas Steyn
Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
description New Zealand responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a combination of border restrictions and an Alert Level (AL) system that included strict stay-at-home orders. These interventions were successful in containing an outbreak and ultimately eliminating community transmission of COVID-19 in June 2020. The timing of interventions is crucial to their success. Delaying interventions may reduce their effectiveness and mean that they need to be maintained for a longer period. We use a stochastic branching process model of COVID-19 transmission and control to simulate the epidemic trajectory in New Zealand's March–April 2020 outbreak and the effect of its interventions. We calculate key measures, including the number of reported cases and deaths, and the probability of elimination within a specified time frame. By comparing these measures under alternative timings of interventions, we show that changing the timing of AL4 (the strictest level of restrictions) has a far greater impact than the timing of border measures. Delaying AL4 restrictions results in considerably worse outcomes. Implementing border measures alone, without AL4 restrictions, is insufficient to control the outbreak. We conclude that the early introduction of stay-at-home orders was crucial in reducing the number of cases and deaths, enabling elimination.
format article
author Rachelle N. Binny
Michael G. Baker
Shaun C. Hendy
Alex James
Audrey Lustig
Michael J. Plank
Kannan M. Ridings
Nicholas Steyn
author_facet Rachelle N. Binny
Michael G. Baker
Shaun C. Hendy
Alex James
Audrey Lustig
Michael J. Plank
Kannan M. Ridings
Nicholas Steyn
author_sort Rachelle N. Binny
title Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
title_short Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
title_full Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
title_fullStr Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
title_full_unstemmed Early intervention is the key to success in COVID-19 control
title_sort early intervention is the key to success in covid-19 control
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1ffdcdd6686045cebacc4de89e4f23df
work_keys_str_mv AT rachellenbinny earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT michaelgbaker earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT shaunchendy earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT alexjames earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT audreylustig earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT michaeljplank earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT kannanmridings earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
AT nicholassteyn earlyinterventionisthekeytosuccessincovid19control
_version_ 1718425786105462784