Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants

Peter G Whang,1 Emily Darr,2 S Craig Meyer,3 Don Kovalsky,4 Clay Frank,5 Harry Lockstadt,6 Robert Limoni,7 Andy J Redmond,8 Philip Ploska,9 Michael Oh,10 Abhineet Chowdhary,11 Daniel Cher,12 Travis Hillen13 1Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whang PG, Darr E, Meyer SC, Kovalsky D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Limoni R, Redmond AJ, Ploska P, Oh M, Chowdhary A, Cher D, Hillen T
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/20187a6db3124779bc97d4a90e1534f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:20187a6db3124779bc97d4a90e1534f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:20187a6db3124779bc97d4a90e1534f92021-12-02T08:42:40ZLong-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/20187a6db3124779bc97d4a90e1534f92019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/long-term-prospective-clinical-and-radiographic-outcomes-after-minimal-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Peter G Whang,1 Emily Darr,2 S Craig Meyer,3 Don Kovalsky,4 Clay Frank,5 Harry Lockstadt,6 Robert Limoni,7 Andy J Redmond,8 Philip Ploska,9 Michael Oh,10 Abhineet Chowdhary,11 Daniel Cher,12 Travis Hillen13 1Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; 2Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 3Columbia Orthopaedic Medical Group, Columbia, Mo, USA; 4Orthopaedic Center of Southern Illinois, Mt. Vernon, IL, USA; 5Integrated Spine Care, Wawautosa, WI, USA; 6Bluegrass Orthopedics, Lexington, KY, USA; 7BayCare Clinic Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Green Bay, WI, USA; 8Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA; 9OrthoSpine Solutions, Stockbridge, GA, USA; 10Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 11Neuroscience Institute, Overlake Hospital, Bellevue, WA, USA; 12Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 13Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USACorrespondence: Peter G WhangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USAEmail peter.whang@yale.eduBackground: Accumulating evidence supports the long-term safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.Objective: To report 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up in patients undergoing SIJF using triangular titanium implants (TTI).Methods: One hundred and three subjects at 12 centers treated with SIJF using TTI in two prospective clinical trials (NCT01640353 and NCT01681004) were enrolled and followed in the current study (NCT02270203) with clinic visits at 3, 4 and 5 years. CT scans performed at 5 years were compared to prior CT scans (at 1 or 2 years) by an independent radiologist.Results: Compared to baseline scores, SIJ pain scores at 5 years decreased by a mean of 54 points, disability scores (Oswestry Disability Index) decreased by 26 points, and quality of life scores (EuroQOL-5D time trade-off index) increased by 0.29 points (0–1 scale) (all p<0.0001). Satisfaction rates were high and the proportion of subjects taking opioids decreased from 77% at baseline to 41% at 5-year follow-up. Independent radiographic analysis showed a high rate (98%) of bone apposition to implants on both the sacral and iliac sides of the SI joint, with a high rate of bony bridging (87%) and a low rate of radiolucencies suggestive of loosening (5%).Conclusion: A 5-year follow-up showed continued excellent clinical responses in patients with SIJ pain treated with SIJF using triangular titanium implants along with a high rate (88%) of joint fusion.Level of evidence: Level II.Keywords: sacroiliac joint pain, sacroiliac joint degeneration, arthrodesis, sacroiliac joint fusionWhang PGDarr EMeyer SCKovalsky DFrank CLockstadt HLimoni RRedmond AJPloska POh MChowdhary ACher DCher DHillen TDove Medical Pressarticle• Sacroiliac joint pain • Sacroiliac joint degeneration • Arthrodesis • Sacroiliac joint fusionMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol Volume 12, Pp 411-422 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic • Sacroiliac joint pain • Sacroiliac joint degeneration • Arthrodesis • Sacroiliac joint fusion
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle • Sacroiliac joint pain • Sacroiliac joint degeneration • Arthrodesis • Sacroiliac joint fusion
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Whang PG
Darr E
Meyer SC
Kovalsky D
Frank C
Lockstadt H
Limoni R
Redmond AJ
Ploska P
Oh M
Chowdhary A
Cher D
Cher D
Hillen T
Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
description Peter G Whang,1 Emily Darr,2 S Craig Meyer,3 Don Kovalsky,4 Clay Frank,5 Harry Lockstadt,6 Robert Limoni,7 Andy J Redmond,8 Philip Ploska,9 Michael Oh,10 Abhineet Chowdhary,11 Daniel Cher,12 Travis Hillen13 1Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; 2Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 3Columbia Orthopaedic Medical Group, Columbia, Mo, USA; 4Orthopaedic Center of Southern Illinois, Mt. Vernon, IL, USA; 5Integrated Spine Care, Wawautosa, WI, USA; 6Bluegrass Orthopedics, Lexington, KY, USA; 7BayCare Clinic Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Green Bay, WI, USA; 8Precision Spine Care, Tyler, TX, USA; 9OrthoSpine Solutions, Stockbridge, GA, USA; 10Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 11Neuroscience Institute, Overlake Hospital, Bellevue, WA, USA; 12Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 13Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USACorrespondence: Peter G WhangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USAEmail peter.whang@yale.eduBackground: Accumulating evidence supports the long-term safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.Objective: To report 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up in patients undergoing SIJF using triangular titanium implants (TTI).Methods: One hundred and three subjects at 12 centers treated with SIJF using TTI in two prospective clinical trials (NCT01640353 and NCT01681004) were enrolled and followed in the current study (NCT02270203) with clinic visits at 3, 4 and 5 years. CT scans performed at 5 years were compared to prior CT scans (at 1 or 2 years) by an independent radiologist.Results: Compared to baseline scores, SIJ pain scores at 5 years decreased by a mean of 54 points, disability scores (Oswestry Disability Index) decreased by 26 points, and quality of life scores (EuroQOL-5D time trade-off index) increased by 0.29 points (0–1 scale) (all p<0.0001). Satisfaction rates were high and the proportion of subjects taking opioids decreased from 77% at baseline to 41% at 5-year follow-up. Independent radiographic analysis showed a high rate (98%) of bone apposition to implants on both the sacral and iliac sides of the SI joint, with a high rate of bony bridging (87%) and a low rate of radiolucencies suggestive of loosening (5%).Conclusion: A 5-year follow-up showed continued excellent clinical responses in patients with SIJ pain treated with SIJF using triangular titanium implants along with a high rate (88%) of joint fusion.Level of evidence: Level II.Keywords: sacroiliac joint pain, sacroiliac joint degeneration, arthrodesis, sacroiliac joint fusion
format article
author Whang PG
Darr E
Meyer SC
Kovalsky D
Frank C
Lockstadt H
Limoni R
Redmond AJ
Ploska P
Oh M
Chowdhary A
Cher D
Cher D
Hillen T
author_facet Whang PG
Darr E
Meyer SC
Kovalsky D
Frank C
Lockstadt H
Limoni R
Redmond AJ
Ploska P
Oh M
Chowdhary A
Cher D
Cher D
Hillen T
author_sort Whang PG
title Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
title_short Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
title_full Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
title_fullStr Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
title_sort long-term prospective clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/20187a6db3124779bc97d4a90e1534f9
work_keys_str_mv AT whangpg longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT darre longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT meyersc longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT kovalskyd longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT frankc longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT lockstadth longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT limonir longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT redmondaj longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT ploskap longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT ohm longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT chowdharya longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT cherd longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT cherd longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
AT hillent longtermprospectiveclinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterminimallyinvasivelateraltransiliacsacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplants
_version_ 1718398407537590272