Revolutionary Science

ABSTRACT On rare occasions in the history of science, remarkable discoveries transform human society and forever alter mankind’s view of the world. Examples of such discoveries include the heliocentric theory, Newtonian physics, the germ theory of disease, quantum theory, plate tectonics and the dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C. Fang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2023e4e5ab53433d88b0bd8f81b4ca68
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2023e4e5ab53433d88b0bd8f81b4ca68
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2023e4e5ab53433d88b0bd8f81b4ca682021-11-15T15:41:42ZRevolutionary Science10.1128/mBio.00158-162150-7511https://doaj.org/article/2023e4e5ab53433d88b0bd8f81b4ca682016-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00158-16https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT On rare occasions in the history of science, remarkable discoveries transform human society and forever alter mankind’s view of the world. Examples of such discoveries include the heliocentric theory, Newtonian physics, the germ theory of disease, quantum theory, plate tectonics and the discovery that DNA carries genetic information. The science philosopher Thomas Kuhn famously described science as long periods of normality punctuated by times of crisis, when anomalous observations culminate in revolutionary changes that replace one paradigm with another. This essay examines several transformative discoveries in the light of Kuhn’s formulation. We find that each scientific revolution is unique, with disparate origins that may include puzzle solving, serendipity, inspiration, or a convergence of disparate observations. The causes of revolutionary science are varied and lack an obvious common structure. Moreover, it can be difficult to draw a clear distinction between so-called normal and revolutionary science. Revolutionary discoveries often emerge from basic science and are critically dependent on nonrevolutionary research. Revolutionary discoveries may be conceptual or technological in nature, lead to the creation of new fields, and have a lasting impact on many fields in addition to the field from which they emerge. In contrast to political revolutions, scientific revolutions do not necessarily require the destruction of the previous order. For humanity to continue to benefit from revolutionary discoveries, a broad palette of scientific inquiry with a particular emphasis on basic science should be supported.Arturo CasadevallFerric C. FangAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 7, Iss 2 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle Microbiology
QR1-502
Arturo Casadevall
Ferric C. Fang
Revolutionary Science
description ABSTRACT On rare occasions in the history of science, remarkable discoveries transform human society and forever alter mankind’s view of the world. Examples of such discoveries include the heliocentric theory, Newtonian physics, the germ theory of disease, quantum theory, plate tectonics and the discovery that DNA carries genetic information. The science philosopher Thomas Kuhn famously described science as long periods of normality punctuated by times of crisis, when anomalous observations culminate in revolutionary changes that replace one paradigm with another. This essay examines several transformative discoveries in the light of Kuhn’s formulation. We find that each scientific revolution is unique, with disparate origins that may include puzzle solving, serendipity, inspiration, or a convergence of disparate observations. The causes of revolutionary science are varied and lack an obvious common structure. Moreover, it can be difficult to draw a clear distinction between so-called normal and revolutionary science. Revolutionary discoveries often emerge from basic science and are critically dependent on nonrevolutionary research. Revolutionary discoveries may be conceptual or technological in nature, lead to the creation of new fields, and have a lasting impact on many fields in addition to the field from which they emerge. In contrast to political revolutions, scientific revolutions do not necessarily require the destruction of the previous order. For humanity to continue to benefit from revolutionary discoveries, a broad palette of scientific inquiry with a particular emphasis on basic science should be supported.
format article
author Arturo Casadevall
Ferric C. Fang
author_facet Arturo Casadevall
Ferric C. Fang
author_sort Arturo Casadevall
title Revolutionary Science
title_short Revolutionary Science
title_full Revolutionary Science
title_fullStr Revolutionary Science
title_full_unstemmed Revolutionary Science
title_sort revolutionary science
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/2023e4e5ab53433d88b0bd8f81b4ca68
work_keys_str_mv AT arturocasadevall revolutionaryscience
AT ferriccfang revolutionaryscience
_version_ 1718427630322057216