Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions

Soft and continuum robots are transforming medical interventions thanks to their flexibility, miniaturization, and multidirectional movement abilities. Although flexibility enables reaching targets in unstructured and dynamic environments, it also creates challenges for control, especially due to in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sujit Kumar Sahu, Canberk Sozer, Benoit Rosa, Izadyar Tamadon, Pierre Renaud, Arianna Menciassi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2026cba36c8c4261bdb91f66fcd4afdb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2026cba36c8c4261bdb91f66fcd4afdb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2026cba36c8c4261bdb91f66fcd4afdb2021-11-19T11:17:00ZShape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions2296-914410.3389/frobt.2021.758411https://doaj.org/article/2026cba36c8c4261bdb91f66fcd4afdb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.758411/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-9144Soft and continuum robots are transforming medical interventions thanks to their flexibility, miniaturization, and multidirectional movement abilities. Although flexibility enables reaching targets in unstructured and dynamic environments, it also creates challenges for control, especially due to interactions with the anatomy. Thus, in recent years lots of efforts have been devoted for the development of shape reconstruction methods, with the advancement of different kinematic models, sensors, and imaging techniques. These methods can increase the performance of the control action as well as provide the tip position of robotic manipulators relative to the anatomy. Each method, however, has its advantages and disadvantages and can be worthwhile in different situations. For example, electromagnetic (EM) and Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor-based shape reconstruction methods can be used in small-scale robots due to their advantages thanks to miniaturization, fast response, and high sensitivity. Yet, the problem of electromagnetic interference in the case of EM sensors, and poor response to high strains in the case of FBG sensors need to be considered. To help the reader make a suitable choice, this paper presents a review of recent progress on shape reconstruction methods, based on a systematic literature search, excluding pure kinematic models. Methods are classified into two categories. First, sensor-based techniques are presented that discuss the use of various sensors such as FBG, EM, and passive stretchable sensors for reconstructing the shape of the robots. Second, imaging-based methods are discussed that utilize images from different imaging systems such as fluoroscopy, endoscopy cameras, and ultrasound for the shape reconstruction process. The applicability, benefits, and limitations of each method are discussed. Finally, the paper draws some future promising directions for the enhancement of the shape reconstruction methods by discussing open questions and alternative methods.Sujit Kumar SahuSujit Kumar SahuSujit Kumar SahuCanberk SozerCanberk SozerBenoit RosaIzadyar TamadonIzadyar TamadonPierre RenaudArianna MenciassiArianna MenciassiFrontiers Media S.A.articleshape reconstructionelectromagnetic sensoroptical sensorsmedical image based techniquespassive stretchable sensorssensing in minimally invasive surgeryMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570Electronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95ENFrontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic shape reconstruction
electromagnetic sensor
optical sensors
medical image based techniques
passive stretchable sensors
sensing in minimally invasive surgery
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
spellingShingle shape reconstruction
electromagnetic sensor
optical sensors
medical image based techniques
passive stretchable sensors
sensing in minimally invasive surgery
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Canberk Sozer
Canberk Sozer
Benoit Rosa
Izadyar Tamadon
Izadyar Tamadon
Pierre Renaud
Arianna Menciassi
Arianna Menciassi
Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
description Soft and continuum robots are transforming medical interventions thanks to their flexibility, miniaturization, and multidirectional movement abilities. Although flexibility enables reaching targets in unstructured and dynamic environments, it also creates challenges for control, especially due to interactions with the anatomy. Thus, in recent years lots of efforts have been devoted for the development of shape reconstruction methods, with the advancement of different kinematic models, sensors, and imaging techniques. These methods can increase the performance of the control action as well as provide the tip position of robotic manipulators relative to the anatomy. Each method, however, has its advantages and disadvantages and can be worthwhile in different situations. For example, electromagnetic (EM) and Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor-based shape reconstruction methods can be used in small-scale robots due to their advantages thanks to miniaturization, fast response, and high sensitivity. Yet, the problem of electromagnetic interference in the case of EM sensors, and poor response to high strains in the case of FBG sensors need to be considered. To help the reader make a suitable choice, this paper presents a review of recent progress on shape reconstruction methods, based on a systematic literature search, excluding pure kinematic models. Methods are classified into two categories. First, sensor-based techniques are presented that discuss the use of various sensors such as FBG, EM, and passive stretchable sensors for reconstructing the shape of the robots. Second, imaging-based methods are discussed that utilize images from different imaging systems such as fluoroscopy, endoscopy cameras, and ultrasound for the shape reconstruction process. The applicability, benefits, and limitations of each method are discussed. Finally, the paper draws some future promising directions for the enhancement of the shape reconstruction methods by discussing open questions and alternative methods.
format article
author Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Canberk Sozer
Canberk Sozer
Benoit Rosa
Izadyar Tamadon
Izadyar Tamadon
Pierre Renaud
Arianna Menciassi
Arianna Menciassi
author_facet Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Sujit Kumar Sahu
Canberk Sozer
Canberk Sozer
Benoit Rosa
Izadyar Tamadon
Izadyar Tamadon
Pierre Renaud
Arianna Menciassi
Arianna Menciassi
author_sort Sujit Kumar Sahu
title Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
title_short Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
title_full Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
title_fullStr Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Shape Reconstruction Processes for Interventional Application Devices: State of the Art, Progress, and Future Directions
title_sort shape reconstruction processes for interventional application devices: state of the art, progress, and future directions
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2026cba36c8c4261bdb91f66fcd4afdb
work_keys_str_mv AT sujitkumarsahu shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT sujitkumarsahu shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT sujitkumarsahu shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT canberksozer shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT canberksozer shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT benoitrosa shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT izadyartamadon shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT izadyartamadon shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT pierrerenaud shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT ariannamenciassi shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
AT ariannamenciassi shapereconstructionprocessesforinterventionalapplicationdevicesstateoftheartprogressandfuturedirections
_version_ 1718420117466906624