Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.

<h4>Background</h4>Although procedures like appendectomy have been studied extensively, the relative importance of each surgeon's surgical volume-to-ruptured appendicitis has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of ruptured appendicitis by surgeon...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Po-Li Wei, Shih-Ping Liu, Joseph J Keller, Herng-Ching Lin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2055b8a1c82740659113d3de2e9bcc74
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2055b8a1c82740659113d3de2e9bcc74
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2055b8a1c82740659113d3de2e9bcc742021-11-18T08:03:40ZVolume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0052539https://doaj.org/article/2055b8a1c82740659113d3de2e9bcc742012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23300703/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Although procedures like appendectomy have been studied extensively, the relative importance of each surgeon's surgical volume-to-ruptured appendicitis has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of ruptured appendicitis by surgeon-volume groups as a measure of quality of care for appendicitis by using a nationwide population-based dataset.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified 65,339 first-time hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of acute appendicitis (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 540, 540.0, 540.1 and 540.9) between January 2007 and December 2009. We used "whether or not a patient had a perforated appendicitis" as the outcome measure. A conditional (fixed-effect) logistic regression model was performed to explore the odds of perforated appendicitis among surgeon case volume groups.<h4>Results</h4>Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher morbidity rates than those treated by high-volume (28.1% vs. 26.15, p<0.001) and very-high-volume surgeons (28.1% vs. 21.4%, p<0.001). After adjusting for surgeon practice location, and teaching status of practice hospital, and patient age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, and hospital acute appendicitis volume, patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher rates of perforated appendicitis than those treated by medium-volume surgeons (OR = 1.09, p<0.001), high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.16, p<0.001), or very-high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.54, p<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our study suggested that surgeon volume is an important factor with regard to the rate of ruptured appendicitis.Po-Li WeiShih-Ping LiuJoseph J KellerHerng-Ching LinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 12, p e52539 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Po-Li Wei
Shih-Ping Liu
Joseph J Keller
Herng-Ching Lin
Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Although procedures like appendectomy have been studied extensively, the relative importance of each surgeon's surgical volume-to-ruptured appendicitis has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of ruptured appendicitis by surgeon-volume groups as a measure of quality of care for appendicitis by using a nationwide population-based dataset.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified 65,339 first-time hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of acute appendicitis (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 540, 540.0, 540.1 and 540.9) between January 2007 and December 2009. We used "whether or not a patient had a perforated appendicitis" as the outcome measure. A conditional (fixed-effect) logistic regression model was performed to explore the odds of perforated appendicitis among surgeon case volume groups.<h4>Results</h4>Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher morbidity rates than those treated by high-volume (28.1% vs. 26.15, p<0.001) and very-high-volume surgeons (28.1% vs. 21.4%, p<0.001). After adjusting for surgeon practice location, and teaching status of practice hospital, and patient age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, and hospital acute appendicitis volume, patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher rates of perforated appendicitis than those treated by medium-volume surgeons (OR = 1.09, p<0.001), high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.16, p<0.001), or very-high-volume surgeons (OR = 1.54, p<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Our study suggested that surgeon volume is an important factor with regard to the rate of ruptured appendicitis.
format article
author Po-Li Wei
Shih-Ping Liu
Joseph J Keller
Herng-Ching Lin
author_facet Po-Li Wei
Shih-Ping Liu
Joseph J Keller
Herng-Ching Lin
author_sort Po-Li Wei
title Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
title_short Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
title_full Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
title_fullStr Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
title_full_unstemmed Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
title_sort volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/2055b8a1c82740659113d3de2e9bcc74
work_keys_str_mv AT poliwei volumeoutcomerelationforacuteappendicitisevidencefromanationwidepopulationbasedstudy
AT shihpingliu volumeoutcomerelationforacuteappendicitisevidencefromanationwidepopulationbasedstudy
AT josephjkeller volumeoutcomerelationforacuteappendicitisevidencefromanationwidepopulationbasedstudy
AT herngchinglin volumeoutcomerelationforacuteappendicitisevidencefromanationwidepopulationbasedstudy
_version_ 1718422529473773568