A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection

Objective: Helicobacter pylori eradication is recommended in gastric and duodenal ulcer and MALT lymphoma management. For following up for patients after treatment of h.pylori infection, invasive and non-invasive procedures can be performed. The objective of this study was to compare invasive and no...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sh Savad Koohi, B Heidari, AR Firooz Jahi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2001
Materias:	serology h.pylori endoscopy Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/20610e02bc3d41bbadbff14d5b54fd0d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:20610e02bc3d41bbadbff14d5b54fd0d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:20610e02bc3d41bbadbff14d5b54fd0d2021-11-10T09:21:13ZA comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/20610e02bc3d41bbadbff14d5b54fd0d2001-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-2847-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170Objective: Helicobacter pylori eradication is recommended in gastric and duodenal ulcer and MALT lymphoma management. For following up for patients after treatment of h.pylori infection, invasive and non-invasive procedures can be performed. The objective of this study was to compare invasive and non-invasive procedures. Methods: 150 patients with h.pylori positive were selected for our study and divided into three groups. In all groups quadruple therapy (Omeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and amoxicillin) was done. One month later endoscopy and biopsy, serology (H.pylori ELISA IgA) and serology (H.pylori ELISA IgG) were done in first, second and third group respectively and compared for h.pylori eradication. Findings: 127 patients remained as subjects in our study. In first group, endoscopy and biopsy was done again and we found no h.pylori in 70.7% of the cases of the first group, 35.7% and 20.5% of the cases of the second and third group respectively and this difference was statistically meaningful (P<0.001). Conclusion: In spite of the fact that endoscopy and biopsy in comparison to serology is an invasive procedure, it is recommended for short term follow up of patients (One months).Sh Savad KoohiB HeidariAR Firooz JahiBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticleserologyh.pyloriendoscopyMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 15-18 (2001)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	serology h.pylori endoscopy Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	serology h.pylori endoscopy Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Sh Savad Koohi B Heidari AR Firooz Jahi A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
description	Objective: Helicobacter pylori eradication is recommended in gastric and duodenal ulcer and MALT lymphoma management. For following up for patients after treatment of h.pylori infection, invasive and non-invasive procedures can be performed. The objective of this study was to compare invasive and non-invasive procedures. Methods: 150 patients with h.pylori positive were selected for our study and divided into three groups. In all groups quadruple therapy (Omeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and amoxicillin) was done. One month later endoscopy and biopsy, serology (H.pylori ELISA IgA) and serology (H.pylori ELISA IgG) were done in first, second and third group respectively and compared for h.pylori eradication. Findings: 127 patients remained as subjects in our study. In first group, endoscopy and biopsy was done again and we found no h.pylori in 70.7% of the cases of the first group, 35.7% and 20.5% of the cases of the second and third group respectively and this difference was statistically meaningful (P<0.001). Conclusion: In spite of the fact that endoscopy and biopsy in comparison to serology is an invasive procedure, it is recommended for short term follow up of patients (One months).
format	article
author	Sh Savad Koohi B Heidari AR Firooz Jahi
author_facet	Sh Savad Koohi B Heidari AR Firooz Jahi
author_sort	Sh Savad Koohi
title	A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
title_short	A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
title_full	A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
title_fullStr	A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
title_full_unstemmed	A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection
title_sort	comparison between serology (elisa) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of h.pylori infection
publisher	Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2001
url	https://doaj.org/article/20610e02bc3d41bbadbff14d5b54fd0d
work_keys_str_mv	AT shsavadkoohi acomparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection AT bheidari acomparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection AT arfiroozjahi acomparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection AT shsavadkoohi comparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection AT bheidari comparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection AT arfiroozjahi comparisonbetweenserologyelisaandendoscopyandbiopsyinthefollowupofpatientsaftertreatmentofhpyloriinfection
_version_	1718440081941856256

A comparison between serology (ELISA) and endoscopy and biopsy in the follow up of patients after treatment of H.pylori infection

Ejemplares similares