Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]

Ewa Zasadzka, Anna Pieczyńska, Tomasz Trzmiel, Mariola Pawlaczyk Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Pozna, PolandCorrespondence: Ewa Zasadzka Email ezasad@ump.edu.plWe are very thankful for the critical remarks given by Ozlem Yilmaz and Gulistan&...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zasadzka E, Pieczyńska A, Trzmiel T, Pawlaczyk M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/211bcb5d7e5a4d419c2edfbadedb90e0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:211bcb5d7e5a4d419c2edfbadedb90e0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:211bcb5d7e5a4d419c2edfbadedb90e02021-12-02T10:15:55ZImportant Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/211bcb5d7e5a4d419c2edfbadedb90e02020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/response-polish-translation-and-validation-of-the-sarc-f-tool-for-the--peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Ewa Zasadzka, Anna Pieczyńska, Tomasz Trzmiel, Mariola Pawlaczyk Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Pozna, PolandCorrespondence: Ewa Zasadzka Email ezasad@ump.edu.plWe are very thankful for the critical remarks given by Ozlem Yilmaz and Gulistan Bahat and the interest of our article titled “Polish Translation and Validation of the SARC-F Tool for the Assessment of Sarcopenia”.We agree with Ozlem Yilmaz and Gulistan Bahat that in cases with clinically suspected sarcopenia the use of SARC-F is not mandatory/obligatory as the first diagnostic step, and therefore could be omitted in this group of patients. Answering the second problematic point we would like to explain that we decided to use 4.5 kg in the first question of the SARC-F questionnaire because this weight was used in previous publications presenting the validation results of the questionnaire.1,2 The weight of 3 bottles of still water (1.5 kg each) commonly bought in Poland seemed to be a clear and straightforward way of explaining the actual weight in question.View the original paper by Zasadzka and colleaguesThis is in response to the Letter to the EditorZasadzka EPieczyńska ATrzmiel TPawlaczyk MDove Medical PressarticleGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 15, Pp 969-970 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Zasadzka E
Pieczyńska A
Trzmiel T
Pawlaczyk M
Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
description Ewa Zasadzka, Anna Pieczyńska, Tomasz Trzmiel, Mariola Pawlaczyk Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Pozna, PolandCorrespondence: Ewa Zasadzka Email ezasad@ump.edu.plWe are very thankful for the critical remarks given by Ozlem Yilmaz and Gulistan Bahat and the interest of our article titled “Polish Translation and Validation of the SARC-F Tool for the Assessment of Sarcopenia”.We agree with Ozlem Yilmaz and Gulistan Bahat that in cases with clinically suspected sarcopenia the use of SARC-F is not mandatory/obligatory as the first diagnostic step, and therefore could be omitted in this group of patients. Answering the second problematic point we would like to explain that we decided to use 4.5 kg in the first question of the SARC-F questionnaire because this weight was used in previous publications presenting the validation results of the questionnaire.1,2 The weight of 3 bottles of still water (1.5 kg each) commonly bought in Poland seemed to be a clear and straightforward way of explaining the actual weight in question.View the original paper by Zasadzka and colleaguesThis is in response to the Letter to the Editor
format article
author Zasadzka E
Pieczyńska A
Trzmiel T
Pawlaczyk M
author_facet Zasadzka E
Pieczyńska A
Trzmiel T
Pawlaczyk M
author_sort Zasadzka E
title Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
title_short Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
title_full Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
title_fullStr Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
title_full_unstemmed Important Points to Consider During Practical Application and in the Validation Studies of SARC-F Tool to Screen Sarcopenia [Response to Letter]
title_sort important points to consider during practical application and in the validation studies of sarc-f tool to screen sarcopenia [response to letter]
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/211bcb5d7e5a4d419c2edfbadedb90e0
work_keys_str_mv AT zasadzkae importantpointstoconsiderduringpracticalapplicationandinthevalidationstudiesofsarcftooltoscreensarcopeniaresponsetoletter
AT pieczynskaa importantpointstoconsiderduringpracticalapplicationandinthevalidationstudiesofsarcftooltoscreensarcopeniaresponsetoletter
AT trzmielt importantpointstoconsiderduringpracticalapplicationandinthevalidationstudiesofsarcftooltoscreensarcopeniaresponsetoletter
AT pawlaczykm importantpointstoconsiderduringpracticalapplicationandinthevalidationstudiesofsarcftooltoscreensarcopeniaresponsetoletter
_version_ 1718397455628763136