A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery

Importance The scleral buckle technique is difficult to teach, given a decrease in the frequency of its use and the challenges of its video recording. Background This study compares two different modalities for recording intraoperative videos of scleral buckle surgery. Design P...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rebecca R. Soares, Melissa R. Sieber, Katherine E. Talcott, Allen Chiang, Sunir J. Garg
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Materias:	scleral buckle surgical teaching surgical video wearable device Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/211be343ef6844efb92e33f95031a565
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:211be343ef6844efb92e33f95031a565
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:211be343ef6844efb92e33f95031a5652021-11-10T23:30:42ZA Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery2475-475710.1055/s-0041-1733931https://doaj.org/article/211be343ef6844efb92e33f95031a5652021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1733931https://doaj.org/toc/2475-4757Importance The scleral buckle technique is difficult to teach, given a decrease in the frequency of its use and the challenges of its video recording. Background This study compares two different modalities for recording intraoperative videos of scleral buckle surgery. Design Present study is a cross-sectional survey conducted in an academic hospital. Participants A total of 36 medical students, ophthalmologic residents, and vitreoretinal surgery fellows participated in this survey. Methods Five scleral buckle surgeries were filmed simultaneously using Google Glass and GoPro. Single-masked survey of trainees comparing video and audio quality of 38 10-second clips from each device, and listing the steps of scleral buckle surgery. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Main Outcome Measures Trainees were asked for grading the video device with respect to audio and video quality as favorable or unfavorable. Results GoPro clips had more favorable ratings of video (73.3%) and audio (75.9%), compared with Google Glass (36.7 and 58.5%, respectively; p < 0.005). A total of 2.8% respondents listed the correct order of surgical steps in pretest, compared with 55.6% in posttest (p < 0.005). Conclusion and Relevance Wearable recording devices can allow for video recording of scleral buckle surgery which has high utility in teaching trainees. GoPro and Google Glass each have distinct advantages.Rebecca R. SoaresMelissa R. SieberKatherine E. TalcottAllen ChiangSunir J. GargThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.articlescleral bucklesurgical teachingsurgical videowearable deviceOphthalmologyRE1-994ENJournal of Academic Ophthalmology, Vol 13, Iss 02, Pp e124-e128 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	scleral buckle surgical teaching surgical video wearable device Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	scleral buckle surgical teaching surgical video wearable device Ophthalmology RE1-994 Rebecca R. Soares Melissa R. Sieber Katherine E. Talcott Allen Chiang Sunir J. Garg A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
description	Importance The scleral buckle technique is difficult to teach, given a decrease in the frequency of its use and the challenges of its video recording. Background This study compares two different modalities for recording intraoperative videos of scleral buckle surgery. Design Present study is a cross-sectional survey conducted in an academic hospital. Participants A total of 36 medical students, ophthalmologic residents, and vitreoretinal surgery fellows participated in this survey. Methods Five scleral buckle surgeries were filmed simultaneously using Google Glass and GoPro. Single-masked survey of trainees comparing video and audio quality of 38 10-second clips from each device, and listing the steps of scleral buckle surgery. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Main Outcome Measures Trainees were asked for grading the video device with respect to audio and video quality as favorable or unfavorable. Results GoPro clips had more favorable ratings of video (73.3%) and audio (75.9%), compared with Google Glass (36.7 and 58.5%, respectively; p < 0.005). A total of 2.8% respondents listed the correct order of surgical steps in pretest, compared with 55.6% in posttest (p < 0.005). Conclusion and Relevance Wearable recording devices can allow for video recording of scleral buckle surgery which has high utility in teaching trainees. GoPro and Google Glass each have distinct advantages.
format	article
author	Rebecca R. Soares Melissa R. Sieber Katherine E. Talcott Allen Chiang Sunir J. Garg
author_facet	Rebecca R. Soares Melissa R. Sieber Katherine E. Talcott Allen Chiang Sunir J. Garg
author_sort	Rebecca R. Soares
title	A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
title_short	A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
title_full	A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
title_fullStr	A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
title_full_unstemmed	A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery
title_sort	comparative analysis of use of google glass versus. gopro intraoperative video recording of scleral buckle surgery
publisher	Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/211be343ef6844efb92e33f95031a565
work_keys_str_mv	AT rebeccarsoares acomparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT melissarsieber acomparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT katherineetalcott acomparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT allenchiang acomparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT sunirjgarg acomparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT rebeccarsoares comparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT melissarsieber comparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT katherineetalcott comparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT allenchiang comparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery AT sunirjgarg comparativeanalysisofuseofgoogleglassversusgoprointraoperativevideorecordingofscleralbucklesurgery
_version_	1718439652657987584

A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery

Ejemplares similares