Polypharmacology of clinical sodium glucose co‐transport protein 2 inhibitors and relationship to suspected adverse drug reactions
Abstract Sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a promising second‐line treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with a developing landscape of both beneficial cardio‐ and nephroprotective properties and emerging adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including diabetic ketoaci...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2165848a28d741d482d78c9b86e58971 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Abstract Sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a promising second‐line treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with a developing landscape of both beneficial cardio‐ and nephroprotective properties and emerging adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), genetic mycotic infections, and amputations among others. A national register study (MHRA Yellow Card, UK) was used to quantify the SGLT2i's suspected ADRs relative to their Rx rate (OpenPrescribing, UK). The polypharmacology profiles of SGLT2i were data‐mined (ChEMBL) for the first time. The ADR reports (n = 3629) and prescribing numbers (Rx n = 5,813,325) for each SGLT2i in the United Kingdom (from launch date to the beginning December 2019) were determined. Empagliflozin possesses the most selective SGLT2/SGLT1 inhibition profile at ~2500‐fold, ~10‐fold more selective than cangliflozin (~260‐fold). Canagliflozin was found to also inhibit CYP at clinically achievable concentrations. We find that for overall ADR rates, empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin and empagliflozin versus canagliflozin are statistically significant (χ2, p < .05), while dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin is not. In terms of overall ADRs, there is a greater relative rate for canagliflozin > dapagliflozin > empagliflozin. For fatalities, there is a greater relative rate for dapagliflozin > canagliflozin > empagliflozin. An organ classification that resulted in a statistically significant difference between SGLT2i was suspected infection/infestation ADRs between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Our findings at this stage of SGLT2i usage in the United Kingdom suggest that empagliflozin, the most selective SGLT2i, had the lowest suspected ADR incident rate (relative to prescribing) and in all reported classes of ADRs identified including infections, amputations, and DKA. |
|---|