A homozygous nonsense mutation in DCBLD2 is a candidate cause of developmental delay, dysmorphic features and restrictive cardiomyopathy
Abstract DCBLD2 encodes discodin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 2, a type-I transmembrane receptor that is involved in intracellular receptor signalling pathways and the regulation of cell growth. In this report, we describe a 5-year-old female who presented severe clinical features, includ...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/218446d81b0a4deda8e7c1a821aa05c8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | Abstract DCBLD2 encodes discodin, CUB and LCCL domain-containing protein 2, a type-I transmembrane receptor that is involved in intracellular receptor signalling pathways and the regulation of cell growth. In this report, we describe a 5-year-old female who presented severe clinical features, including restrictive cardiomyopathy, developmental delay, spasticity and dysmorphic features. Trio-whole-exome sequencing and segregation analysis were performed to identify the genetic cause of the disease within the family. A novel homozygous nonsense variant in the DCBLD2 gene (c.80G > A, p.W27*) was identified as the most likely cause of the patient’s phenotype. This nonsense variant falls in the extracellular N-terminus of DCBLD2 and thus might affect proper protein function of the transmembrane receptor. A number of in vitro investigations were performed on the proband’s skin fibroblasts compared to normal fibroblasts, which allowed a comprehensive assessment resulting in the functional characterization of the identified DCBLD2 nonsense variant in different cellular processes. Our data propose a significant association between the identified variant and the observed reduction in cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, intracellular ROS, and Ca2 + levels, which would likely explain the phenotypic presentation of the patient as associated with lethal restrictive cardiomyopathy. |
---|