Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rea Antoniou, Heather Romero-Kornblum, J Clayton Young, Michelle You, Joel H Kramer, Winston Chiong
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd2021-12-02T20:07:47ZReduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259110https://doaj.org/article/221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259110https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.Rea AntoniouHeather Romero-KornblumJ Clayton YoungMichelle YouJoel H KramerWinston ChiongPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0259110 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Rea Antoniou Heather Romero-Kornblum J Clayton Young Michelle You Joel H Kramer Winston Chiong Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
description	The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.
format	article
author	Rea Antoniou Heather Romero-Kornblum J Clayton Young Michelle You Joel H Kramer Winston Chiong
author_facet	Rea Antoniou Heather Romero-Kornblum J Clayton Young Michelle You Joel H Kramer Winston Chiong
author_sort	Rea Antoniou
title	Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_short	Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_full	Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_fullStr	Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_full_unstemmed	Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_sort	reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the covid-19 pandemic.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd
work_keys_str_mv	AT reaantoniou reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic AT heatherromerokornblum reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic AT jclaytonyoung reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic AT michelleyou reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic AT joelhkramer reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic AT winstonchiong reducedutilitarianwillingnesstoviolatepersonalrightsduringthecovid19pandemic
_version_	1718375228411740160

Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ejemplares similares