Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study

(1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scannin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hani Tohme, Ghida Lawand, Rita Eid, Khaled E. Ahmed, Ziad Salameh, Joseph Makzoume
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b2021-11-11T14:59:19ZAccuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study10.3390/app112198592076-3417https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9859https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417(1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) at the level of intraoral scan bodies in terms of angular deviations and 3D discrepancies. (2) Methods: A stone master cast representing an edentulous maxilla using four implant analogs was fabricated. The two anterior implants were parallel to each other, and the two posterior implants were at an angulation of 17 degrees. Digital intraoral scanning (DIOS) impressions were taken after connecting implant level scan bodies to the master cast and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Digital photogrammetry (DPG) impressions were captured using a PiC Camera after tightening implant level PiC optical markers and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Superimposition was carried out by a software for determining the accuracy of both. (3) Results: Significant angular discrepancies (ΔA) and 3D deviations of scan bodies were found among the groups in trueness with lower deviations for the DPG (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). However, trueness within ISBs varied between angular and 3D deviations and outcomes were not specific to determine the effect of implant angulation. In precision, no significant differences were detected within ISBs and among both groups in terms of angular deviation. However, DPG had less deviations than DIOS group in terms of 3D deviations (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Digital photogrammetry technique conveyed the utmost accuracy in both trueness and precision for the intraoral scan bodies among both impression methods assessed. In addition, implant angulation did not influence the precision of the impression techniques but affected their trueness without explicit conclusions.Hani TohmeGhida LawandRita EidKhaled E. AhmedZiad SalamehJoseph MakzoumeMDPI AGarticleangulated implantsimplant supported prosthesisintraoral scanningphotogrammetryTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 9859, p 9859 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic angulated implants
implant supported prosthesis
intraoral scanning
photogrammetry
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle angulated implants
implant supported prosthesis
intraoral scanning
photogrammetry
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Hani Tohme
Ghida Lawand
Rita Eid
Khaled E. Ahmed
Ziad Salameh
Joseph Makzoume
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
description (1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) at the level of intraoral scan bodies in terms of angular deviations and 3D discrepancies. (2) Methods: A stone master cast representing an edentulous maxilla using four implant analogs was fabricated. The two anterior implants were parallel to each other, and the two posterior implants were at an angulation of 17 degrees. Digital intraoral scanning (DIOS) impressions were taken after connecting implant level scan bodies to the master cast and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Digital photogrammetry (DPG) impressions were captured using a PiC Camera after tightening implant level PiC optical markers and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Superimposition was carried out by a software for determining the accuracy of both. (3) Results: Significant angular discrepancies (ΔA) and 3D deviations of scan bodies were found among the groups in trueness with lower deviations for the DPG (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). However, trueness within ISBs varied between angular and 3D deviations and outcomes were not specific to determine the effect of implant angulation. In precision, no significant differences were detected within ISBs and among both groups in terms of angular deviation. However, DPG had less deviations than DIOS group in terms of 3D deviations (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Digital photogrammetry technique conveyed the utmost accuracy in both trueness and precision for the intraoral scan bodies among both impression methods assessed. In addition, implant angulation did not influence the precision of the impression techniques but affected their trueness without explicit conclusions.
format article
author Hani Tohme
Ghida Lawand
Rita Eid
Khaled E. Ahmed
Ziad Salameh
Joseph Makzoume
author_facet Hani Tohme
Ghida Lawand
Rita Eid
Khaled E. Ahmed
Ziad Salameh
Joseph Makzoume
author_sort Hani Tohme
title Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
title_short Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
title_full Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
title_sort accuracy of implant level intraoral scanning and photogrammetry impression techniques in a complete arch with angled and parallel implants: an in vitro study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b
work_keys_str_mv AT hanitohme accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
AT ghidalawand accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
AT ritaeid accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
AT khaledeahmed accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
AT ziadsalameh accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
AT josephmakzoume accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1718437867457347584