Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study
(1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scannin...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b2021-11-11T14:59:19ZAccuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study10.3390/app112198592076-3417https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9859https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417(1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) at the level of intraoral scan bodies in terms of angular deviations and 3D discrepancies. (2) Methods: A stone master cast representing an edentulous maxilla using four implant analogs was fabricated. The two anterior implants were parallel to each other, and the two posterior implants were at an angulation of 17 degrees. Digital intraoral scanning (DIOS) impressions were taken after connecting implant level scan bodies to the master cast and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Digital photogrammetry (DPG) impressions were captured using a PiC Camera after tightening implant level PiC optical markers and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Superimposition was carried out by a software for determining the accuracy of both. (3) Results: Significant angular discrepancies (ΔA) and 3D deviations of scan bodies were found among the groups in trueness with lower deviations for the DPG (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). However, trueness within ISBs varied between angular and 3D deviations and outcomes were not specific to determine the effect of implant angulation. In precision, no significant differences were detected within ISBs and among both groups in terms of angular deviation. However, DPG had less deviations than DIOS group in terms of 3D deviations (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Digital photogrammetry technique conveyed the utmost accuracy in both trueness and precision for the intraoral scan bodies among both impression methods assessed. In addition, implant angulation did not influence the precision of the impression techniques but affected their trueness without explicit conclusions.Hani TohmeGhida LawandRita EidKhaled E. AhmedZiad SalamehJoseph MakzoumeMDPI AGarticleangulated implantsimplant supported prosthesisintraoral scanningphotogrammetryTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 9859, p 9859 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
angulated implants implant supported prosthesis intraoral scanning photogrammetry Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 |
spellingShingle |
angulated implants implant supported prosthesis intraoral scanning photogrammetry Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Hani Tohme Ghida Lawand Rita Eid Khaled E. Ahmed Ziad Salameh Joseph Makzoume Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
description |
(1) Background: Stereophotogrammetry has recently been investigated showing high accuracy in complete implant supported cases but has scarcely been investigated in cases of tilted implants. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of digital impression techniques (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) at the level of intraoral scan bodies in terms of angular deviations and 3D discrepancies. (2) Methods: A stone master cast representing an edentulous maxilla using four implant analogs was fabricated. The two anterior implants were parallel to each other, and the two posterior implants were at an angulation of 17 degrees. Digital intraoral scanning (DIOS) impressions were taken after connecting implant level scan bodies to the master cast and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Digital photogrammetry (DPG) impressions were captured using a PiC Camera after tightening implant level PiC optical markers and STL files were exported (<i>n</i> = 15). Superimposition was carried out by a software for determining the accuracy of both. (3) Results: Significant angular discrepancies (ΔA) and 3D deviations of scan bodies were found among the groups in trueness with lower deviations for the DPG (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). However, trueness within ISBs varied between angular and 3D deviations and outcomes were not specific to determine the effect of implant angulation. In precision, no significant differences were detected within ISBs and among both groups in terms of angular deviation. However, DPG had less deviations than DIOS group in terms of 3D deviations (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: Digital photogrammetry technique conveyed the utmost accuracy in both trueness and precision for the intraoral scan bodies among both impression methods assessed. In addition, implant angulation did not influence the precision of the impression techniques but affected their trueness without explicit conclusions. |
format |
article |
author |
Hani Tohme Ghida Lawand Rita Eid Khaled E. Ahmed Ziad Salameh Joseph Makzoume |
author_facet |
Hani Tohme Ghida Lawand Rita Eid Khaled E. Ahmed Ziad Salameh Joseph Makzoume |
author_sort |
Hani Tohme |
title |
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
title_short |
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
title_full |
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort |
accuracy of implant level intraoral scanning and photogrammetry impression techniques in a complete arch with angled and parallel implants: an in vitro study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2252a4a0b8bd493a815df5b2b6cf777b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hanitohme accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy AT ghidalawand accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy AT ritaeid accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy AT khaledeahmed accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy AT ziadsalameh accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy AT josephmakzoume accuracyofimplantlevelintraoralscanningandphotogrammetryimpressiontechniquesinacompletearchwithangledandparallelimplantsaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1718437867457347584 |