Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review

Objective. To analyze the literature available on the psychometric properties of the instruments to measure knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the nursing care process. Methods. This was a narrative-type review conducted by following the recommendations of the PRISMA declaration. The search st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera, María Alejandra Ortega-Barco, María Camila Rojas-Plata, Daniela Marín-Rodríguez, Lizeth Johana Alarcón-Meléndez, Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Universidad de Antioquia 2021
Materias:	nursing process standardized nursing terminology nursing methodology research health knowledge attitudes practice Nursing RT1-120
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/22cfa3d1df3d4fd9a2c0baf9081aa1b6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:22cfa3d1df3d4fd9a2c0baf9081aa1b6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:22cfa3d1df3d4fd9a2c0baf9081aa1b62021-11-26T19:21:54ZMeasurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review2216-028010.17533/udea.iee.v39n3e15https://doaj.org/article/22cfa3d1df3d4fd9a2c0baf9081aa1b62021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/347897https://doaj.org/toc/2216-0280Objective. To analyze the literature available on the psychometric properties of the instruments to measure knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the nursing care process. Methods. This was a narrative-type review conducted by following the recommendations of the PRISMA declaration. The search strategy was executed in two stages; through the search in databases by two reviewers and – thereafter – three reviewers identified independently the studies and evaluated the methodological quality of the measurement instruments by using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) property checklist boxes. Results. Of 71 studies identified for the full-text review, only seven complied with the inclusion criteria that represent four instruments (Q-DIO, D-CATCH, NP-CDSS, PNP). It was found that the instruments continue in their validation and appropriation processes to reality in health services. Conclusion. In spite of the evident evolution of the instruments to evaluate the implementation of the nursing care process, the need is still valid for an instrument that measures aspects of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in every stage of the process.Fabio Alberto Camargo-FigueraMaría Alejandra Ortega-BarcoMaría Camila Rojas-PlataDaniela Marín-RodríguezLizeth Johana Alarcón-MeléndezBeatriz Villamizar-CarvajalUniversidad de Antioquiaarticlenursing processstandardized nursing terminologynursing methodology researchhealth knowledgeattitudespracticeNursingRT1-120ENInvestigación y Educación en Enfermería, Vol 39, Iss 3 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	nursing process standardized nursing terminology nursing methodology research health knowledge attitudes practice Nursing RT1-120
spellingShingle	nursing process standardized nursing terminology nursing methodology research health knowledge attitudes practice Nursing RT1-120 Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera María Alejandra Ortega-Barco María Camila Rojas-Plata Daniela Marín-Rodríguez Lizeth Johana Alarcón-Meléndez Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
description	Objective. To analyze the literature available on the psychometric properties of the instruments to measure knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the nursing care process. Methods. This was a narrative-type review conducted by following the recommendations of the PRISMA declaration. The search strategy was executed in two stages; through the search in databases by two reviewers and – thereafter – three reviewers identified independently the studies and evaluated the methodological quality of the measurement instruments by using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) property checklist boxes. Results. Of 71 studies identified for the full-text review, only seven complied with the inclusion criteria that represent four instruments (Q-DIO, D-CATCH, NP-CDSS, PNP). It was found that the instruments continue in their validation and appropriation processes to reality in health services. Conclusion. In spite of the evident evolution of the instruments to evaluate the implementation of the nursing care process, the need is still valid for an instrument that measures aspects of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in every stage of the process.
format	article
author	Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera María Alejandra Ortega-Barco María Camila Rojas-Plata Daniela Marín-Rodríguez Lizeth Johana Alarcón-Meléndez Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal
author_facet	Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera María Alejandra Ortega-Barco María Camila Rojas-Plata Daniela Marín-Rodríguez Lizeth Johana Alarcón-Meléndez Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal
author_sort	Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera
title	Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
title_short	Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
title_full	Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
title_fullStr	Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed	Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review
title_sort	measurement of practices-knowledge-attitudes of the nursing process: systematic review
publisher	Universidad de Antioquia
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/22cfa3d1df3d4fd9a2c0baf9081aa1b6
work_keys_str_mv	AT fabioalbertocamargofiguera measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview AT mariaalejandraortegabarco measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview AT mariacamilarojasplata measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview AT danielamarinrodriguez measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview AT lizethjohanaalarconmelendez measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview AT beatrizvillamizarcarvajal measurementofpracticesknowledgeattitudesofthenursingprocesssystematicreview
_version_	1718409277088989184

Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review

Ejemplares similares