Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Trachoma causes blindness through an anatomical abnormality called trichiasis (lashes touching the eye). Trichiasis can recur after corrective surgery. We tested the hypothesis that using absorbable sutures instead of silk sutures might reduce the risk of recurrent dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saul N Rajak, Esmael Habtamu, Helen A Weiss, Amir Bedri Kello, Teshome Gebre, Asrat Genet, Robin L Bailey, David C W Mabey, Peng T Khaw, Clare E Gilbert, Paul M Emerson, Matthew J Burton
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/22f08a93d23b4357b197f12484dc1cfb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:22f08a93d23b4357b197f12484dc1cfb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:22f08a93d23b4357b197f12484dc1cfb2021-11-18T05:42:25ZAbsorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1001137https://doaj.org/article/22f08a93d23b4357b197f12484dc1cfb2011-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22180732/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Trachoma causes blindness through an anatomical abnormality called trichiasis (lashes touching the eye). Trichiasis can recur after corrective surgery. We tested the hypothesis that using absorbable sutures instead of silk sutures might reduce the risk of recurrent disease among patients with major trichiasis in a randomised trial.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>1,300 individuals with major trichiasis from rural villages in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia were recruited and assigned (1:1) by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive trichiasis surgery using either an absorbable suture (polyglactin-910) or silk sutures (removed at 7-10 days) in an otherwise identical surgical technique. Participants were examined every 6 months for 2 years by clinicians masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was recurrent trichiasis (≥one lash touching the eye) at 1 year. There was no difference in prevalence of recurrent trichiasis at 1 year (114 [18.2%] in the absorbable suture group versus 120 [19.7%] in the silk suture group; odds ratio = 0.90, 95% CI 0.68-1.20). The two groups also did not differ in terms of corneal opacification, visual acuity, conjunctival inflammation, and surgical complications.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There was no evidence that use of absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures was associated with a lower prevalence of trichiasis recurrence at 1 year postsurgery than silk sutures. However, from a programmatic perspective, polyglactin-910 offers the major advantage that patients do not have to be seen soon after surgery for suture removal. The postoperative review after surgery using absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures can be delayed for 3-6 months, which might allow us to better determine whether a patient needs additional surgery.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00522860.Saul N RajakEsmael HabtamuHelen A WeissAmir Bedri KelloTeshome GebreAsrat GenetRobin L BaileyDavid C W MabeyPeng T KhawClare E GilbertPaul M EmersonMatthew J BurtonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e1001137 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Saul N Rajak
Esmael Habtamu
Helen A Weiss
Amir Bedri Kello
Teshome Gebre
Asrat Genet
Robin L Bailey
David C W Mabey
Peng T Khaw
Clare E Gilbert
Paul M Emerson
Matthew J Burton
Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
description <h4>Background</h4>Trachoma causes blindness through an anatomical abnormality called trichiasis (lashes touching the eye). Trichiasis can recur after corrective surgery. We tested the hypothesis that using absorbable sutures instead of silk sutures might reduce the risk of recurrent disease among patients with major trichiasis in a randomised trial.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>1,300 individuals with major trichiasis from rural villages in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia were recruited and assigned (1:1) by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive trichiasis surgery using either an absorbable suture (polyglactin-910) or silk sutures (removed at 7-10 days) in an otherwise identical surgical technique. Participants were examined every 6 months for 2 years by clinicians masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was recurrent trichiasis (≥one lash touching the eye) at 1 year. There was no difference in prevalence of recurrent trichiasis at 1 year (114 [18.2%] in the absorbable suture group versus 120 [19.7%] in the silk suture group; odds ratio = 0.90, 95% CI 0.68-1.20). The two groups also did not differ in terms of corneal opacification, visual acuity, conjunctival inflammation, and surgical complications.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There was no evidence that use of absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures was associated with a lower prevalence of trichiasis recurrence at 1 year postsurgery than silk sutures. However, from a programmatic perspective, polyglactin-910 offers the major advantage that patients do not have to be seen soon after surgery for suture removal. The postoperative review after surgery using absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures can be delayed for 3-6 months, which might allow us to better determine whether a patient needs additional surgery.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00522860.
format article
author Saul N Rajak
Esmael Habtamu
Helen A Weiss
Amir Bedri Kello
Teshome Gebre
Asrat Genet
Robin L Bailey
David C W Mabey
Peng T Khaw
Clare E Gilbert
Paul M Emerson
Matthew J Burton
author_facet Saul N Rajak
Esmael Habtamu
Helen A Weiss
Amir Bedri Kello
Teshome Gebre
Asrat Genet
Robin L Bailey
David C W Mabey
Peng T Khaw
Clare E Gilbert
Paul M Emerson
Matthew J Burton
author_sort Saul N Rajak
title Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
title_short Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
title_full Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
title_fullStr Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
title_sort absorbable versus silk sutures for surgical treatment of trachomatous trichiasis in ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/22f08a93d23b4357b197f12484dc1cfb
work_keys_str_mv AT saulnrajak absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT esmaelhabtamu absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT helenaweiss absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT amirbedrikello absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT teshomegebre absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT asratgenet absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robinlbailey absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davidcwmabey absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pengtkhaw absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clareegilbert absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT paulmemerson absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT matthewjburton absorbableversussilksuturesforsurgicaltreatmentoftrachomatoustrichiasisinethiopiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718424774596624384