Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework

Abstract Empirical pharmacometric models are part of practically every regulatory submission for a new drug. The use of the models often exceeds descriptory roles and this change in their context of use increase the requirements on the evidence to support that they are credible. However, when it com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ine Skottheim Rusten, Flora Tshinanu Musuamba
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/22f9226774ba4d07af13a0fb0501d239
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:22f9226774ba4d07af13a0fb0501d239
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:22f9226774ba4d07af13a0fb0501d2392021-11-15T18:41:53ZScientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework2163-830610.1002/psp4.12708https://doaj.org/article/22f9226774ba4d07af13a0fb0501d2392021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12708https://doaj.org/toc/2163-8306Abstract Empirical pharmacometric models are part of practically every regulatory submission for a new drug. The use of the models often exceeds descriptory roles and this change in their context of use increase the requirements on the evidence to support that they are credible. However, when it comes to assessing the trust in a model for a specific application, current tools are skewed to technical aspects and guidance documents often focused on model reporting or the iterative learning loops of model informed drug development (MIDD). There is an unmet need for a holistic tool that provide an end‐to‐end link from the initial question to the model‐informed decision. We suggest the risk‐informed credibility framework can be used for this purpose and offers strong support for the pharmacometrics models. We also introduce two tables for explicit description of key attributes of the model evaluation to facilitate and streamline the communication between stakeholders.Ine Skottheim RustenFlora Tshinanu MusuambaWileyarticleTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Vol 10, Iss 11, Pp 1281-1296 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
spellingShingle Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Ine Skottheim Rusten
Flora Tshinanu Musuamba
Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
description Abstract Empirical pharmacometric models are part of practically every regulatory submission for a new drug. The use of the models often exceeds descriptory roles and this change in their context of use increase the requirements on the evidence to support that they are credible. However, when it comes to assessing the trust in a model for a specific application, current tools are skewed to technical aspects and guidance documents often focused on model reporting or the iterative learning loops of model informed drug development (MIDD). There is an unmet need for a holistic tool that provide an end‐to‐end link from the initial question to the model‐informed decision. We suggest the risk‐informed credibility framework can be used for this purpose and offers strong support for the pharmacometrics models. We also introduce two tables for explicit description of key attributes of the model evaluation to facilitate and streamline the communication between stakeholders.
format article
author Ine Skottheim Rusten
Flora Tshinanu Musuamba
author_facet Ine Skottheim Rusten
Flora Tshinanu Musuamba
author_sort Ine Skottheim Rusten
title Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
title_short Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
title_full Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
title_fullStr Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
title_full_unstemmed Scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: An application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
title_sort scientific and regulatory evaluation of empirical pharmacometric models: an application of the risk informed credibility assessment framework
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/22f9226774ba4d07af13a0fb0501d239
work_keys_str_mv AT ineskottheimrusten scientificandregulatoryevaluationofempiricalpharmacometricmodelsanapplicationoftheriskinformedcredibilityassessmentframework
AT floratshinanumusuamba scientificandregulatoryevaluationofempiricalpharmacometricmodelsanapplicationoftheriskinformedcredibilityassessmentframework
_version_ 1718426833465114624