Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.

In contrast to patients with underlying cancer or chronic disease, injury patients are relatively young, and can be expected to live their natural lifespan if injuries are appropriately treated. Multiple and repeated diagnostic scans might be performed in these patients during admission. Nevertheles...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Je Sung You, Hye-Jeong Lee, Yong Eun Chung, Hye Sun Lee, Myo Jeong Kim, Sung Phil Chung, Myeong-Jin Kim, Incheol Park, Ki Whang Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/22fcdf4a8b6c44a8a993b702fba33d04
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:22fcdf4a8b6c44a8a993b702fba33d04
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:22fcdf4a8b6c44a8a993b702fba33d042021-11-18T08:40:15ZDiagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0084870https://doaj.org/article/22fcdf4a8b6c44a8a993b702fba33d042013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24386427/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203In contrast to patients with underlying cancer or chronic disease, injury patients are relatively young, and can be expected to live their natural lifespan if injuries are appropriately treated. Multiple and repeated diagnostic scans might be performed in these patients during admission. Nevertheless, radiation exposure in injury patients has been overlooked and underestimated because of the emergent nature of such situations. Therefore, we tried to assess the cumulative effective dose (cED) of injury patients in the emergency department. We included patients who visited the emergency department (ED) of a single tertiary hospital due to injury between February 2010 and February 2011. The cED for each patient was calculated and compared across age, sex and injury mechanism. A total of 11,676 visits (mean age: 28.0 years, M:F = 6,677:4,999) were identified. Although CT consisted of only 7.8% of total radiologic examinations (n=78,025), it accounted for 87.1% of the total cED. The mean cED per visit was 2.6 mSv. A significant difference in the cED among injury mechanisms was seen (p<0.001) and patients with traffic accidents and fall down injuries showed relatively high cED values. Hence, to reduce the cED of injury patients, an age-, sex- and injury mechanism-specific dose reduction strategy should be considered.Je Sung YouHye-Jeong LeeYong Eun ChungHye Sun LeeMyo Jeong KimSung Phil ChungMyeong-Jin KimIncheol ParkKi Whang KimPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e84870 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Je Sung You
Hye-Jeong Lee
Yong Eun Chung
Hye Sun Lee
Myo Jeong Kim
Sung Phil Chung
Myeong-Jin Kim
Incheol Park
Ki Whang Kim
Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
description In contrast to patients with underlying cancer or chronic disease, injury patients are relatively young, and can be expected to live their natural lifespan if injuries are appropriately treated. Multiple and repeated diagnostic scans might be performed in these patients during admission. Nevertheless, radiation exposure in injury patients has been overlooked and underestimated because of the emergent nature of such situations. Therefore, we tried to assess the cumulative effective dose (cED) of injury patients in the emergency department. We included patients who visited the emergency department (ED) of a single tertiary hospital due to injury between February 2010 and February 2011. The cED for each patient was calculated and compared across age, sex and injury mechanism. A total of 11,676 visits (mean age: 28.0 years, M:F = 6,677:4,999) were identified. Although CT consisted of only 7.8% of total radiologic examinations (n=78,025), it accounted for 87.1% of the total cED. The mean cED per visit was 2.6 mSv. A significant difference in the cED among injury mechanisms was seen (p<0.001) and patients with traffic accidents and fall down injuries showed relatively high cED values. Hence, to reduce the cED of injury patients, an age-, sex- and injury mechanism-specific dose reduction strategy should be considered.
format article
author Je Sung You
Hye-Jeong Lee
Yong Eun Chung
Hye Sun Lee
Myo Jeong Kim
Sung Phil Chung
Myeong-Jin Kim
Incheol Park
Ki Whang Kim
author_facet Je Sung You
Hye-Jeong Lee
Yong Eun Chung
Hye Sun Lee
Myo Jeong Kim
Sung Phil Chung
Myeong-Jin Kim
Incheol Park
Ki Whang Kim
author_sort Je Sung You
title Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
title_short Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
title_full Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
title_fullStr Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
title_sort diagnostic radiation exposure of injury patients in the emergency department: a cross-sectional large scaled study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/22fcdf4a8b6c44a8a993b702fba33d04
work_keys_str_mv AT jesungyou diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT hyejeonglee diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT yongeunchung diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT hyesunlee diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT myojeongkim diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT sungphilchung diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT myeongjinkim diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT incheolpark diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
AT kiwhangkim diagnosticradiationexposureofinjurypatientsintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionallargescaledstudy
_version_ 1718421431971217408