Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations
This study examines how four university-based literary scholars in the United States read literary texts. Findings suggest that the scholars used four related literary literacy orientations in their reading: They attended to their affective experiences with literature, built recursive interpretatio...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR |
Publicado: |
Language and Literacy Researchers of Canada
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/230ffc21d65e4ee69304b417de22fa19 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:230ffc21d65e4ee69304b417de22fa19 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:230ffc21d65e4ee69304b417de22fa192021-11-18T12:19:23ZLiterary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations10.20360/langandlit295271496-0974https://doaj.org/article/230ffc21d65e4ee69304b417de22fa192021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.library.ualberta.ca/langandlit/index.php/langandlit/article/view/29527https://doaj.org/toc/1496-0974 This study examines how four university-based literary scholars in the United States read literary texts. Findings suggest that the scholars used four related literary literacy orientations in their reading: They attended to their affective experiences with literature, built recursive interpretations of literature, contextualized literature, and recognized and managed literary complexity. As broad-level disciplinary ways of navigating literature, these literary literacy orientations included the scholars’ meaning-making practices as well as their beliefs, feelings, and attitudes about literature and making sense of it. Findings support and build upon existing scholarship on English disciplinary literacies and offer paths for further research. Eric RackleyLanguage and Literacy Researchers of CanadaarticleTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640Language and LiteraturePENFRLanguage and Literacy: A Canadian Educational e-journal, Vol 23, Iss 3 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR |
topic |
Theory and practice of education LB5-3640 Language and Literature P |
spellingShingle |
Theory and practice of education LB5-3640 Language and Literature P Eric Rackley Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
description |
This study examines how four university-based literary scholars in the United States read literary texts. Findings suggest that the scholars used four related literary literacy orientations in their reading: They attended to their affective experiences with literature, built recursive interpretations of literature, contextualized literature, and recognized and managed literary complexity. As broad-level disciplinary ways of navigating literature, these literary literacy orientations included the scholars’ meaning-making practices as well as their beliefs, feelings, and attitudes about literature and making sense of it. Findings support and build upon existing scholarship on English disciplinary literacies and offer paths for further research.
|
format |
article |
author |
Eric Rackley |
author_facet |
Eric Rackley |
author_sort |
Eric Rackley |
title |
Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
title_short |
Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
title_full |
Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
title_fullStr |
Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Literary Scholars’ Disciplinary Literacy Orientations |
title_sort |
literary scholars’ disciplinary literacy orientations |
publisher |
Language and Literacy Researchers of Canada |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/230ffc21d65e4ee69304b417de22fa19 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ericrackley literaryscholarsdisciplinaryliteracyorientations |
_version_ |
1718420832390217728 |