O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL

In this paper, we propose a reflection on the linguistic policy that establishes the requirement of the Celpe-Bras proficiency exam as proof of knowledge of Portuguese in naturalization processes and on the consequences that it could have on the exercise of citizenship by migrants in the country. To...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Renata Anunciação, Helena Camargo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES PT
Publicado:	Nepan editor 2019
Materias:	migration and refuge naturalization; language ideologies citizenship celpe-bras History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.29327/212070.7.2-2 https://doaj.org/article/231cc467cb70488ba47c893b21ae725d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:231cc467cb70488ba47c893b21ae725d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:231cc467cb70488ba47c893b21ae725d2021-11-19T22:19:46ZO EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASILhttps://doi.org/10.29327/212070.7.2-21807-18562525-5924https://doaj.org/article/231cc467cb70488ba47c893b21ae725d2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://periodicos.ufac.br/index.php/mui/article/view/2764https://doaj.org/toc/1807-1856https://doaj.org/toc/2525-5924In this paper, we propose a reflection on the linguistic policy that establishes the requirement of the Celpe-Bras proficiency exam as proof of knowledge of Portuguese in naturalization processes and on the consequences that it could have on the exercise of citizenship by migrants in the country. To do so, we analyze this requirement based on the theoretical-methodological assumptions of the Celpe-Bras exam (RODRIGUES, 2006; COSTA & CAR-VALHO, 2013), to reflect on which linguistic ideologies (WOOLARD, 1998; MCCARTY, 2011) in Brazil make up this new language policy for migration and refuge. We conclude that the certification requirement represents a vertical ((BIZON & CAMARGO, 2018), racialized and assimilationist language policy (BLACKLEDGE, 2006; EREL et al., 2016) that reinforces dispossession and non-recognition processes (BUTLER & ATHANASIOU, 2013) to which these populations are submitted, operating as a gatekeeping instrument (EREL et al., 2016; TRI-ANDAFYLLIDOU, 2014; PENNYCOOK, 1994) or hindering their access to citizenship.Renata AnunciaçãoHelena CamargoNepan editorarticlemigration and refugenaturalization;language ideologiescitizenshipcelpe-brasHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999ENESPTMuiraquitã, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 10-22 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES PT
topic	migration and refuge naturalization; language ideologies citizenship celpe-bras History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
spellingShingle	migration and refuge naturalization; language ideologies citizenship celpe-bras History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999 Renata Anunciação Helena Camargo O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
description	In this paper, we propose a reflection on the linguistic policy that establishes the requirement of the Celpe-Bras proficiency exam as proof of knowledge of Portuguese in naturalization processes and on the consequences that it could have on the exercise of citizenship by migrants in the country. To do so, we analyze this requirement based on the theoretical-methodological assumptions of the Celpe-Bras exam (RODRIGUES, 2006; COSTA & CAR-VALHO, 2013), to reflect on which linguistic ideologies (WOOLARD, 1998; MCCARTY, 2011) in Brazil make up this new language policy for migration and refuge. We conclude that the certification requirement represents a vertical ((BIZON & CAMARGO, 2018), racialized and assimilationist language policy (BLACKLEDGE, 2006; EREL et al., 2016) that reinforces dispossession and non-recognition processes (BUTLER & ATHANASIOU, 2013) to which these populations are submitted, operating as a gatekeeping instrument (EREL et al., 2016; TRI-ANDAFYLLIDOU, 2014; PENNYCOOK, 1994) or hindering their access to citizenship.
format	article
author	Renata Anunciação Helena Camargo
author_facet	Renata Anunciação Helena Camargo
author_sort	Renata Anunciação
title	O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
title_short	O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
title_full	O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
title_fullStr	O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
title_full_unstemmed	O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL
title_sort	o exame celpe-bras como política gatekeeping para a naturalização no brasil
publisher	Nepan editor
publishDate	2019
url	https://doi.org/10.29327/212070.7.2-2 https://doaj.org/article/231cc467cb70488ba47c893b21ae725d
work_keys_str_mv	AT renataanunciacao oexamecelpebrascomopoliticagatekeepingparaanaturalizacaonobrasil AT helenacamargo oexamecelpebrascomopoliticagatekeepingparaanaturalizacaonobrasil
_version_	1718419823117991936

O EXAME CELPE-BRAS COMO POLÍTICA GATEKEEPING PARA A NATURALIZAÇÃO NO BRASIL

Ejemplares similares